28 3. José Carlos Huilca Flores, son of Pedro Huilca Tecse and Martha Flores Gutiérrez; 4. Indira Isabel Huilca Flores, daughter of Pedro Huilca Tecse and Martha Flores Gutiérrez; 5. Flor de María Huilca Gutiérrez, daughter of Pedro Huilca Tecse; 6. Pedro Humberto Huilca Gutiérrez, son of Pedro Huilca Tecse; 7. Katiuska Tatiana Huilca Gutiérrez, daughter of Pedro Huilca Tecse; and 8. Julio César Escobar Flores, son of Martha Flores Gutiérrez, who lived with her and with Pedro Huilca Tecse until the time of the latter’s death. 92. The Court observes that the agreement reached by the parties is compatible with the American Convention and the case law of the Court;29 it therefore endorses this point of the agreement. The Court understands, and the agreement on the methods and time limits for complying with the reparations reiterates (supra para. 28), that these persons must be considered beneficiaries of reparations in their capacity as successors of Pedro Huilca Tecse, on the one hand, and as direct victims of the violation of the rights to a fair trial and to judicial protection, as established in this judgment (supra, para. 83), on the other hand. Consequently, the Court considers that Martha Flores Gutiérrez, José Carlos Huilca Flores, Indira Isabel Huilca Flores, Flor de María Huilca Gutiérrez, Pedro Humberto Huilca Gutiérrez, Katiuska Tatiana Huilca Gutiérrez and Julio César Escobar Flores should be considered beneficiaries of reparations, for these two reasons. * C) * * Pecuniary damage 93. In this section, the Court will refer to pecuniary damage, which usually presumes the loss or harm to the victim’s income, the expenses incurred owing to the facts and the consequences of a pecuniary nature that have a causal link to the facts of the case sub judice,30 for which, when appropriate, it establishes a compensatory amount that seeks to compensate the patrimonial consequences of the violations that have been declared in the judgment. To this end, the Court will take into account the agreement on the methods and time limits for complying with the reparations, the Court’s case law, and the arguments of the parties. 94. In the section of the agreement on the methods and time limits for complying with the reparations entitled “Measures of financial compensation,” the State undertakes to pay the sum of US$20,000.00 (twenty thousand United States dollars) to Martha Flores Gutiérrez, for the pecuniary damage caused as a result of the extrajudicial execution of her companion, Pedro Huilca Tecse. 95. The Court observes that the agreement reached by the parties is compatible with the American Convention and with the Court’s case law, and therefore endorses 29 Cf. Case of Carpio Nicolle et al., supra note 22, para. 97; Case of the Plan de Sánchez Massacre. Reparations, supra note 23, paras. 61 and 62; and Case of De La Cruz Flores, supra note 25, para. 146. 30 Cf. Case of the “Juvenile Reeducation Institute”, supra note 7, para. 283; Case of Ricardo Canese, supra note 24, para. 201; and Case of the Gómez Paquiyauri Brothers, supra note 7, para. 205.