7 these reparations should be included in the budget for the 2006 fiscal exercise. In addition, the Deputy Minister for Financial Administration of the Ministry of Finance had stated that expenses in the draft budget being studied by the National Congress were being reprogrammed in order to prepare a payment schedule for the compensation ordered in this case. 6. The brief of October 19, 2005, in which the State forwarded the “regulations for the medical and psychological treatment […] of the Ministry of Public Health and Social Welfare of Paraguay.” 7. The brief of November 23, 2005, in which the representatives of the victims and their next of kin presented their observations on the first report of the State (supra Having seen paragraph 5) as follows: a) The obligation to publish the proved facts and the operative paragraphs of the judgment was complied with by the State, even though this publication had not respected the allotted time of six months stipulated by the Court; b) They had noted with concern the fact that more than a year had elapsed and Paraguay had not made any progress in the elaboration of the State policy ordered by the Court because, although communications had been sent, no response had yet been received from the said public institutions. Furthermore, the public act to acknowledge international responsibility had not been organized, and it was not sufficient that the authorities had agreed to this act. Consequently, the Court was asked to require the State to comply promptly with this measure of reparation; c) The resolutions adopted are merely administrative measures and, in practice, have been insufficient to comply with the reparations ordered by the Court concerning medical and psychological treatment. The State had only partly distributed some identity cards to facilitate former interns and next of kin of interns of the Institute receiving medical care. They also stated that, regarding the victims in the case who are still deprived of their liberty, noncompliance was even more serious, because the health situation within the establishment was very precarious; consequently, they requested the Court to pay special attention to monitoring this measure of reparation. Two examples of the lack of medical care for the victims of the case are those of Francisco Noé Andrade Báez and Arsenio Joel Barios Báez who suffer from tuberculosis and pneumonia and, despite this, do not receive adequate medication or medical care; d) Although the State had indicated that it had made available to the victims the educational services that could be provided by representatives of the Ministry of Education and Culture, no program of special education had been established; neither had the vocational assistance program ordered by the Court been made available to the victims. Despite repeated requests in this regard, officials from the National Professional Promotion Service had not been involved; e) They had not received any official notification about the final delivery of a place in the Cementerio del Este for the remains of Mario del Pilar Álvarez Pérez. To the contrary, his mother had only received warnings from the personnel of the cemetery that they would take away the space in which her