12 2004, since they are of fundamental importance for the non-repetition of the facts, and that it provide detailed information on compliance with this reparation. 11. That, although the State authorities have issued administrative acts and resolutions in relation to providing psychological treatment to all the former interns of the Institute between August 14, 1996, and July 25, 2001, medical and/or psychological treatment to the former interns injured in the fires, and psychological treatment to the next of kin of the interns who died or were injured, there is no information about the implementation of these measures as regards their continuity, the effectiveness of the treatment, and the number and names of the beneficiaries, or with regard to the reports of the “Ad hoc Committee for Physical and Psychological Evaluation and Monitoring” on execution of this aspect that is pending compliance. Moreover, the Court is concerned about the representatives’ report on the current health conditions and the situation of some of the victims who remain detained. It is essential that the measures adopted are reflected in State reports that describe the mechanisms, actions and objectives determined by the State in function of the particular needs of the beneficiaries of this reparation, so that specific meaning and continuity is given to this measures and so that the Court can monitor the implementation of this form of reparation adequately and effectively. 12. That, although the State has provided information on the creation of a working group, which was already functioning, in order to comply with the obligation to provide vocational assistance and a program of special education for the former interns of the Institute, it has not supplied any information on the specific work proposals, content and duration, or the names of the beneficiaries who are already receiving or who will receive assistance. The Court considers that most of the progress has been administrative in nature, without tangible benefits for the victims. 13. That, even though the State has provided information on several administrative measures it has taken in order to comply with payment of the compensation owed to the victims and reimbursement of costs and expenses to their representatives, almost two years after the judgment was delivered the payment of the amounts stipulated has not been made. 14. That the Court deems it essential that the State adopt all necessary measures to comply promptly with the reparations ordered by the Court in the judgment, and submit current, detailed information on this compliance. 15. That the Court will again monitor the general status of compliance with its judgment of September 2, 2004, and this Order, when it has received pertinent information on the aspects pending compliance. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTSS, pursuant to the authority to monitor compliance with its decisions conferred by Article 33, 62(1), 62(3), 65, 67 and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, Articles 25(1) and 30 of its Statute, and Article 29(2) of its Rules of Procedure,