11 * * 39. That the State pointed out that on December 28, 2008, Legislative Decree No. 1068 became effective, whereby the Procuraduría Pública Supranacional (Supranational Attorney General’s Office) started to operate in order to represent the State before international instances. Furthermore, on January 9, 2009, through Resolución Suprema (Supreme Order) No. 008-2009-JUS, the chief authority thereof was appointed. It further added that from said date the Procuraduría Pública Supranacional (Supranational Attorney General’s Office) “has been taking steps in order to honor the Peruvian State obligations before the Inter-American System and complete the timely fulfillment of the Judgment rendered by the Court.” 40. That the representatives asked the Court comply -as soon as possible- with the paragraphs providing detailed and punctual information on the order to comply with all the obligations imposed by to “[r]equest the State […] to pending fulfillment [and to] keep measures it may have adopted in the Court in its Judgment.” 41. That the Commission noticed that after two years from the rendering of the Judgment, “the State has partially complied with some of the obligations ordered” by the Court. Although it appreciated the measures adopted for that matter, it asked that the State is required to provide “a detailed report where it describes the steps taken in order to comply with each of the ordered items.” 42. That the Court notices that after a long period without the State complying with its obligation to provide information, this situation has substantially improved since the creation of the Procuraduría Pública Supranacional (Supranational Attorney General’s Office). The Court further assesses positively the initial proceedings effected in the last months in order to move forward in the fulfillment of the obligations ordered in the Judgment. THEREFORE, THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, Exercising its powers for monitoring the compliance with its Orders and in accordance with Articles 33, 62(1), 62(3), 65, 67 and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, 25(1) and 30 of the Statute, and 30 and 63 of its Rules of Procedure,7 DECLARES: 1. That the State has partially complied with its obligation set forth in the following operative paragraph of the Judgment: 7 Rules of Procedure approved by the Court in the XLIX Regular Session, held on November 16 to 25, 2000, and partially amended during the LXXXII Regular Session, held from January 19 to 31, 2009.