8 has not enough information regarding the total fulfillment of the obligation set forth in her favor, reason for which it requests the State to inform on the progress of the proceedings tending to exempt Brenda Cantoral-Contreras from the total amount of the expenses she must pay in order to be awarded the degree of Bachelor of Anthropology. 25. That with regard to the other beneficiaries, the Court notices that the fulfillment of this obligation on the part of the State implies, partially, that those beneficiaries have to take some actions tending to the exercise of their right to this reparation measure. In that sense, the Court observes that recently, on April 30, 2009, the representatives allegedly communicated the State the Orders made by some of the beneficiaries in this respect. The Court enhances the importance to move forward in the coordination between the State and the representatives in order to concrete the fulfillment of this obligation and it requests the State to continue to provide information on the proceedings effected and the results obtained. * * * 26. That regarding the obligation to provide psychological and medical treatment to the next of kin declared victims (operative paragraph thirteen of the Judgment), the State informed it has held a series of meetings with the petitioners in which it was concluded that it is necessary to know the requirements of both families in order to forward them to the Ministry of Health. The State further informed that it forwarded a general request to the Ministry of Health in order to inform it in advance of its obligations with regard to the victims of the instant case, once it has gathered the information pending to be forwarded. 27. That the representatives confirmed that they held meetings with the State. They informed that on April 16, 2009, they communicated the State that Vanessa and Brenda Cantoral-Contreras decided to continue to receive psychological treatment at the Centro de Atención Psicosocial (Psychosocial Attention Center, hereinafter referred to as “CAPS”) or with Alfonso Gushiken-Miyagui, who performed the expert witness psychological examination before the Court, pursuant to the terms of paragraph 202 of the Judgment. On the other hand, they requested the affiliation of Pelagia Mélida Contreras de Cantoral, Marco Antonio Cantoral-Lozano, Vanessa Cantoral-Contreras and Brenda Cantoral-Contreras to the health centers of the Seguro Integral de Salud (Health Integral Insurance, hereinafter referred to as “SIS”) closer to their respective domiciles and they provided information with regard to their addresses. However, they have not received any answer on the part of the State. Therefore, “even though they appreciat[ed] the coordination effected”, they considered that this duty has not been fully complied with, reason for which the State must continue to inform the Court on the actions it may effect in that respect. 28. That the Commission observed that despite the State initiated some administrative proceedings aimed to the compliance with this obligation, it has not fulfilled it integrally. Consequently, it requested the Court to ask the State to forward specific and updated information on the treatment offered to the beneficiaries. 29. That the Court assesses positively the measures anticipated by the State in order to comply with this obligation, particularly the meetings held with the