4 PROCEEDING BEFORE THE COURT 12. The Inter-American Commission requirements of its application as follows: set forth the conclusion and the The Commission respectfully requests that Court: Conclude and declare that the State of Colombia has violated the right to life, embodied in Article 4 of the Convention, and Article 3, common to all the 1949 Geneva Conventions1, to the detriment of six persons: Artemio Pantoja Ordoñez, Hernán Javier Cuarán Muchavisoy, Julio Milcíades Cerón Gómez, Edebraiz Cerón Rojas, William Hamilton Cerón Rojas and another person (Hernán Lizcano Jacanamejoy or Moisés Ojeda). Establish the circumstances of the death of a seventh person, who had presumably died in combat (Hernán Lizcano Jacanamejoy or Moisés Ojeda), in order to determine whether the State of Colombia has violated his right to life embodied in Article 4 of the Convention and Article 3, common to all the 1949 Geneva Conventions. Conclude and declare that the State of Colombia has violated the judicial guarantees established in Article 8 and the right to judicial protection established in Article 25 of the Convention to the detriment of Artemio Pantoja Ordoñez, Hernán Javier Cuarán Muchavisoy, Julio Milcíades Cerón Gómez, Edebraiz Cerón Rojas, William Hamilton Cerón Rojas, Hernán Lizcano Jacanamejoy and Moisés Ojeda, and their next of kin. Conclude and declare that, as a consequence of the violations of the rights to life and to judicial guarantees and protection, the State of Colombia has also violated its obligation to respect and guarantee the rights embodied in the Convention, pursuant to Article 1.1 thereof. Order the State of Colombia: a) To conduct a rapid, impartial and effective judicial investigation of the facts denounced and punish those responsible. b) To identify precisely whether the other person extrajudicially executed on January 23, 1991, by members of the national Police Force was Hernán Lizcano Jacanamejoy or Moisés Ojeda. Furthermore, the Honorable Court is requested to order the State of Colombia to carry out a serious investigation in order to clarify the circumstances under which the seventh victim died and about whose death the Commission did not give an opinion. c) To grant integral reparation to the next of kin of the victims; including payment of fair compensation (less the amount that has already been paid as pecuniary compensation in accordance with the judgments in the actions under administrative law in favor of Artemio Pantoja Ordoñez, Hernán Javier Cuarán Muchavisoy, Julio Milcíades Cerón Gómez, Edebraiz Cerón Rojas and William Hamilton Cerón Rojas) and the recovery of the victims’ reputations. d) To adopt the necessary reforms in the regulations and the training programs of the Colombian Armed Forces, so that all military operations are conducted in accordance with the international instruments and custom, applicable to internal armed conflicts. e) That the Colombian State should bear the costs and expenses in which the next of kin of the victims have incurred to litigate this case both nationally and before the Commission and the Court, and reasonable honoraria for their lawyers. 1. Hereafter in this judgment, the 1949 Geneva Conventions will be referred to as “Geneva Conventions” or “1949 Geneva Conventions”.

Select target paragraph3