33 nature and scope of the obligation to make reparation, in order to establish measures addressed at redressing the harm caused to the victims.121 128. International case law and in particular that of the Court has repeatedly established that the judgment constitutes, per se, a form of reparation.122 Nevertheless, considering the circumstances of this case and the violations committed against the victims, the Court finds it pertinent to establish other measures. A. Injured party 129. The Court reiterates that, pursuant to Article 63(1) of the Convention, anyone who has been declared a victim of the violation of any right recognized therein, is considered an injured party. Therefore, the Court considers that Roberto Girón and Pedro Castillo Mendoza are the “injured party.”123 B. Measures of satisfaction 130. The representatives requested, as measures of satisfaction, that the Court order the State to publish the official summary and operative paragraphs of the judgment, once, in a national newspaper, in Spanish. 131. The State did not make specific reference to this measure. 132. In this regard, the Court finds, as it has in other cases,124 that within six months of notification of this judgment the State must publish: (a) the official summary of this judgment prepared by the Court, once, in the Official Gazette, in an appropriate and legible font; (b) the official summary of this judgment prepared by the Court, once, in a national newspaper with widespread circulation in an appropriate and legible font, and (c) this judgment, in its entirety, available for one year on an official website, in a way that is accessible to the public. The State must advise the Court immediately when it has made each of the publications ordered, regardless of the one-year time frame for presenting its first report established in the ninth operative paragraph of this judgment. C. Other measures requested 133. The representatives also asked the Court to order Guatemala to adopt the following measures: a) Measures of satisfaction: (i) a public act to acknowledge international responsibility in Aldea Pinula, municipality of Tiquisate, Department of Escuintla, Republic of Guatemala, with the participation of the family members of Pedro Castillo Mendoza, alleged direct victim deceased. This act should be organized within one year of notification of the judgment that will be delivered; (ii) a public act to acknowledge international responsibility in the place determined by the family members of Roberto Girón – unidentified to date – as only the names of his two sons are known and they Cf. Case of Andrade Salmón v. Bolivia. Merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of December 1, 2016. Series C No. 330, para. 189, and Case of Gorigoitía v. Argentina, supra, para. 62. 122 Cf. Case of Neira Alegría et al. v. Peru. Reparations and costs. Judgment of September 19, 1996. Series C No. 29, para. 56. and Case of Gorigoitía v. Argentina, supra, para. 63. 123 On this basis, all the claims for reparation made by the representatives and the Commission that refer to other persons who are not the injured party will not be examined or ruled on. 124 Cf. Case of Cantoral Benavides v. Peru. Reparations and costs, supra, para. 79, and Case of Gorigoitía v. Argentina, supra, para. 68. 121