5 Department of Meta. Said group was the one that, allegedly, in the month of September 2007, sent an electronic mail announcing raids against several human rights defenders, including Mrs. Rey. Taking into account this type of threats against Mrs. Rey, which the State considered they were extraordinary risky for her in July 2008, and the attack to which she was subject in October 2009, the Tribunal considers that there is still a situation of extreme gravity and urgency of causing irreparable damage to the life and physical integrity that justifies the continuance of the provisional measures adopted in her favor. 1.2. On the situation of the beneficiaries Mariela Duarte, widow of Giraldo and her daughters, Sara and Natalia 11. The representatives informed that thieves broke into Mrs. Mariela Duarte’s residence and stole information in 1997, 2005 and 2007 and that, up to the present, no investigation has been carried out in order to know the causes of the theft and its perpetrators. They indicated that, “this information has been brought before the Court’s attention in a report forwarded on April 8, 2009.” 12. The State alleged that, between 2006 and 2010, it had not received “information in relation to the theft of information" committed against Mrs. Duarte. It further asserted that the beneficiaries, Sara and Natalia Giraldo, “live outside Villavicencio and they are just simply waiting for the implementation of a necessary measure.” 13. The Commission did not rule on the risk situation of the beneficiaries Mariela Duarte and her daughters. 14. The Court verifies that in a report presented by the representatives, it was indicated that, on January 8, 2007, Mariela Duarte informed that, on several occasions, unknown people had broke into her house and that “most of the times, they had not stolen items of value, but they [allegedly] had left a trace of having looked for documentation.” Nevertheless, during 2008, evaluations were carried out, which indicated that Mrs. Duarte de Giraldo and her daughters were at a “common” level of risk and threat. Therefore, based on this situation and taking into account that the facts that gave rise to these provisional measures took place more than thirteen years ago, the Court deems necessary to request the parties to forward information on the persistence of the situation of "extreme gravity and urgency" that led to the adoption of the measures in favor of Mrs. Mariela Duarte de Giraldo and her daughters. Upon receipt of such information, the Tribunal shall assess the relevance of maintaining these measures. 1.3. On the situation of the beneficiary Noemy Palencia 15. The State requested the rescission of the provisional measures in relation to Sister Noemy Palencia, taking into account that “it has been years since the State stopped receiving information on her place of residence"; in addition, there is no request of the beneficiaries to the effect of implementing any measure in her favor and there is no information on “her interest to return to Meta.” 16. The representatives pointed out that said beneficiary “had to leave the country and had been abroad since then and had not returned", which is why "they