40 category or those categories will be added proportionately to the part corresponding to the other(s). 162. In the case of the next of kin of the victims who are eligible for the compensation established in this judgment, and who have died or who die before they receive their respective compensation, it shall be delivered to their successors, according to the applicable domestic law. B) Compensation 163. The Court will proceed to determine the pertinence of granting pecuniary reparations and, if applicable, the amounts. 164. However, before doing so, the Court takes note of the State’s observations in the brief answering the application to the effect that “regarding the pecuniary reparations resulting from the determination of the responsibilities of the Peruvian State, it proposes that the amounts be established according to the policies that the State is already implementing or is about to implement by law and/or administratively,” and that the “State will apply Act No. 28,592 to the next of kin of the ten [sic] persons affected; this Act creates the Integral Reparation Program(PIR), and the regulations in force. It does not consider that it should accept any additional amount as financial compensation.” These arguments, drafted in various different ways, are retained in its final arguments. 165. First, the Court wishes to recall that all aspects of the obligation to repair are regulated by international law.117 Also, the Court appreciates the State’s intention of implementing policies on reparation under domestic law through an integral program, enacted as a law. However, as it has previously, the Court notes that in this case there is no evidence or any probative element that Act No. 28,592 creating the Integral Reparation Program (PIR) has been applied in this case. Consequently, the Court will not examine this argument or analyze the scope of this law.118 B(1) Pecuniary damage 166. The Court recalls that pecuniary damage supposes the loss of the income that the deceased victim would have perceived during his probable lifetime, the expenses incurred owing to the facts, and the consequences of a pecuniary nature that have a direct causal connection with the facts of the case.119 167. Regarding the loss of income of Saúl Cantoral-Huamaní, in their brief with requests, arguments and evidence, the representatives provide a calculation, taking into account different elements such as his age, life expectancy in his specific case, his monthly remuneration as “a welder (level A) of Hierro Peru” and other monetary benefits, and the retirement age in the mining sector. In relation to the loss of income of Consuelo GarcíaSanta Cruz, the representatives make a calculation based on similar criteria: age, life 117 Cf. Case of Velásquez-Rodríguez v. Honduras. Compensatory damages (Art. 63(1) American Convention on Human Rights), supra note 114, para. 30; and Case of Aloeboetoe et al. v. Suriname. Reparations (Art 63(1) American Convention on Human Rights). Judgment of September 10, 1993. Series C No. 15, para. 44. Cf. also Case of the Rochela Massacre v. Colombia, supra note 8, para. 226; Case of La Cantuta v. Peru, supra note 8, para. 200; and Case of the Miguel Castro-Castro Prison v. Peru, supra note 6, para. 415. 118 Cf. Case of La Cantuta v. Peru, supra note 8, para. 212. 119 Cf. Case of Bámaca-Velásquez v. Guatemala. Reparations ((Art. 63(1) American Convention on Human Rights). Judgment of February 22, 2002. Series C No. 91, para. 43. Cf. also Case of La Cantuta v. Peru, supra note 8, para. 213; Case of Goiburú et al. v. Paraguay, supra note 72, para. 150; and Case of Montero Aranguren et al. (Catia Detention Center), supra note 72, para. 126.