76 framework with support from the FF. AA.” Said report was prepared before the Special Military Court.102 197(62) In application of the Ministerial Ruling No. 456-90-IN-PNP and of Articles 35, 36, and 37 of the Rules of Procedure for Police Documentation, on April 13, 1998 the “passive documentation” produced by the Operative and Administrative Units of the Office of Criminal Investigation during the years 1990, 1991, and 1992 was incinerated, among which a great part of the internal case file of the present case was burned.103 197(63) Through Ruling No. 631-2002- MP-FN of April 17, 2002 the Specialized Prosecutors’ Office for Forced Disappearances, Extrajudicial Killings, and Exhumation of Clandestine Graves.104 197(64) On November 25, 2005 the mentioned Specialized Prosecutors’ Office for Forced Disappearances, Extrajudicial Killings, and Exhumation of Clandestine Graves issued a Ruling, that ordered that the police investigation be extended.105 197(65) The Office of Criminal Investigation of the National Police Force of Peru carried out an investigation included in Report No. 121 of May 26, 2004, extended through Report No. 468 of November 28, 2004, “in relation to the alleged Crime against the Life, Body, and Health (Aggravated Murder by PAF and Punishable Intent of Homicide with subsequent injuries by PAF) and alleged Extrajudicial Killings, occurred on May 9, 1992 between 17:30 and 18:30 hours approximately in offense of the inmates imprisoned for terrorism in the Criminal Establishment of Maximum Security Miguel Castro Castro.” In said investigations the direct responsible parties for the mentioned crimes were not individualized. Said report was given before the Specialized Prosecutors’ Office for Forced Disappearances, Extrajudicial Killings, and Exhumation of Clandestine Graves.106 Investigation and prosecution of four inmates 197(66) In the year 1992 the prosecutor’s investigation regarding the events of the present case was directed to exclusively determining the responsibility of the inmates. On June 1, 1992 the Tenth Special Prosecutors’ Office for cases of 102 Cfr. Police report No. 322 of August 7, 1992 (dossier of appendixes to the petition, appendix 288, folios 3922 and 3923). 103 Cfr. Incineration report of April 13, 1998 (dossier of appendixes to the petition, appendix 276, folio 3268); police report N° 004-2001-DIRINCRI-EM-O-DD.HH of July 12, 2001, section III acápite A (dossier of appendixes to the petition, appendix 275, folio 3249); and police report N°09-01 of June 27, 2001 and Police Report No. 006 of July 4, 2001 (dossier of appendixes to the petition, appendix 276, folios 3264 and 3267). 104 Cfr. Police report No. 121-04 of the National Police Force of Peru, Office of Criminal Investigation, of May 26, 2004 (dossier of appendixes to the response to the petition, Volume I, folio 4999). 105 Cfr. Police report No. 121-04 of May 26, 2004 and extended by Report No. 468 of November 28, 2004, issued by the National Police Force of Peru, Office of Criminal Investigation (dossier of appendixes to the response to the petition, Volume I, folios 4999 and 5001). 106 Cfr. Police report No. 121-04 of May 26, 2004 and extended by Report No. 468 of November 28, 2004, issued by the National Police Force of Peru, Office of Criminal Investigation (dossier of appendixes to the response to the petition, Volume I, folios 4999 and 5247).

Select target paragraph3