Unanimously, 1. To declare admissible the request for interpretation presented by the victims’ representatives and by the State in relation to the judgment on preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs delivered in the case of the National Association of Discharged and Retired Employees of the National Tax Administration Superintendence (ANCEJUB-SUNAT) v. Peru pursuant to paragraph 8 of this judgment. 2. To clarify, by interpretation, the judgment on merits, reparations and costs delivered in the case of the National Association of Discharged and Retired Employees of the National Tax Administration Superintendence (ANCEJUB-SUNAT) v. Peru, presented by the representatives, with regard to the determination of the number of victims established in paragraphs 120, 121, 122, 123 and 138, pursuant to paragraphs 17 to 19 of this judgment on interpretation. 3. To clarify, by interpretation, the judgment on merits, reparations and costs delivered in the case of the National Association of Discharged and Retired Employees of the National Tax Administration Superintendence (ANCEJUB-SUNAT) v. Peru, presented by the representatives, with regard to the scope of paragraph 217 and the sixth operative paragraph, pursuant to paragraphs 20 to 22 of this judgment on interpretation. 4. To clarify, by interpretation, the judgment on merits, reparations and costs delivered in the case of the National Association of Discharged and Retired Employees of the National Tax Administration Superintendence (ANCEJUB-SUNAT) v. Peru, presented by the representatives and the State, with regard to paragraphs 225, 226, 227 and the eighth operative paragraph, pursuant to paragraphs 30 to 34 of this judgment on interpretation. 5. To reject, as inadmissible the request for interpretation of the judgment on merits, reparations and costs delivered in the Case of the National Association of Discharged and Retired Employees of the National Tax Administration Superintendence (ANCEJUB-SUNAT) v. Peru presented by the representatives with regard to the sixth operative paragraph, pursuant to paragraph 23 of this judgment on interpretation. 6. To require the Secretariat of the Court to notify this judgment on interpretation to the State, the representatives and the Commission. 11