IX OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS 184. Therefore, THE COURT DECIDES, unanimously, 1. To accept the partial admission of international responsibility made by the State, in the terms of paragraphs 14 to 32 of this judgment. DECLARES, that: 2. The State is responsible for the violation of the rights to acknowledgment of juridical personality, to life, to humane treatment, and to personal liberty, recognized in Articles 3, 4(1), 5(1), 5(2), and 7 of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to Article 1(1) of the same treaty and Article I (a) of the Inter-American Convention on Forced Disappearance of Persons, to the detriment of Fredy Marcelo Núñez Naranjo, in the terms of paragraphs 88 to 100 of this judgment. 3. The State is responsible for the violation of the rights to fair trial and judicial protection, recognized in Articles 8(1) and 25(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to its Article 1(1), as well as with Article I (b) of the Inter-American Convention on Forced Disappearance of Persons, to the detriment of Fredy Marcelo Núñez Naranjo, Sixto Núñez, María Gregoria Naranjo, Silvia Núñez Naranjo, and Marcia Núñez Naranjo. As well as the right to truth, derived from Articles 8(1), 13(1), and 25(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to its Article 1(1), to the detriment of Sixto Núñez, María Gregoria Naranjo, Silvia Núñez Naranjo, and Marcia Núñez Naranjo. All of this, in the terms of paragraphs 112 to 120 of this judgment. 4. The State is responsible for the violation of the right to humane treatment, recognized in Article 5(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to Article 1(1) of the same instrument, to the detriment of Sixto Núñez, María Gregoria Naranjo, Silvia Núñez Naranjo, and Marcia Núñez Naranjo, in the terms of paragraph 127 of this judgment. 5. The State is responsible for the violation of the rights to a fair trial and judicial protection, recognized in Articles 8(1) and 25(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to its Article 1(1), to the detriment of María Gregoria Naranjo and Marcia Núñez Naranjo, in the terms of paragraphs 132 and 133 of this judgment. AND ESTABLISHES, 6. This judgment constitutes per se a form of reparation. -48-