9 set. Therefore, the Court considers this part of the request for interpretation presented by the representatives inadmissible. 33. On the other hand, regarding the condition of victims of the violation of the right to a fair trial and judicial protection (Articles 8(1) and 25 of the American Convention), the Court declared this violation with regard to all the next of kin of the victims killed and missing. In said terms, it is equally clear that the omission of the names of Mrs. Carmen Juana Mariños Figueroa and Mr. Marcelino Marcos Pablo Meza in paragraphs 161, 206(i), and 206(h) and the sixth operative paragraph of the Judgment is a material error that does not affect those determinations. Therefore, it must be clarified that Mrs. Carmen Juana Mariños Figueroa and Mr. Marcelino Marcos Pablo Meza must be understood included in these paragraphs of the Judgment, as victims of these violation, as an injured party and as beneficiaries of the other forms of reparation, respectively. 34. Similarly, and even though an interpretation was not requested in this sense, Messrs. Celina Pablo Meza, Cristina Pablo Meza, Wil Eduardo Mariños Figueroa, Marilú Lozano Torres, Jimmy Anthony Lozano Torres, Miguel Lozano Torres, Augusto Lozano Torres, Celestino Eugencio Rosales Cárdenas, Saturnina Julia Rosales Cárdenas, Ronald Daniel Taboada Fierro, Gustavo Taboada Fierro, Luz Beatriz Taboada Fierro, and Rita Ondina Oyague Sulca are in that same situation. Therefore, the clarification that they must also be understood included in paragraphs 161, 206, and the sixth operative paragraph of the Judgment is in order. 35. Thus, even though in the international proceedings before this Tribunal compensations were not ordered in favor of Mrs. Carmen Juana Mariños Figueroa or of Mr. Marcelino Marcos Pablo Meza, or in favor of the people mentioned in the previous paragraph, this does not exclude the possibility that, based on that stated in the Judgment, they may exercise the domestic recourses appropriate to assert the rights that correspond to them. VII OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS 34. Therefore, THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS pursuant with Article 67 of the American Convention on Human Rights and Articles 29(3) and 59 of the Rules of Procedure DECIDES: Unanimously,