74. As regards the request by the representatives of the next of kin of the victims and of the Commission for Colombia to carry out symbolic acts as measures of nonrecidivism and satisfaction, this Court deems that acknowledgment of responsibility by the State is a positive contribution to the development of these proceedings and to effectiveness of the principles that inspire the American Convention.85 Taking into account the acknowledgment of responsibility by the State in connection with this specific request, the instant Judgment is per se a form of reparation and satisfaction for the next of kin of the victims. 75. Notwithstanding the above, the Court rules that the State, as a measure of satisfaction, must publish once, in the daily Official Gazette and in a press release of the National Police and of the Armed Forces of Colombia, the judgment on the merits issued by the Court on December 6, 2001 and chapter VI, Proven Facts, and operative paragraphs 1 to 4 of the instant judgment. * * 76. In this section, the Court will refer to the remains of Hernán Lizcano Jacanamijoy, which were exhumed and which, according to the Report of the Criminalistics Division of the Technical Investigative Corps of the Office of the Solicitor General of the Republic, regarding the chemical analysis of the metal residues found in the bone remains of said victim,86 are currently under keeping at the Forensic Anthropology Laboratory of the National Institute of Forensic Medicine.87 77. In view of the above, the Court orders the State to deliver the remains of Hernán Lizcano Jacanamijoy to his next of kin, for them to bury those remains in an appropriate manner. To this end, the State must cover the costs of transporting said remains, their burial, and any other steps required to comply with this provision. XI LEGAL COSTS AND EXPENSES Arguments of representatives of the next of kin of the victims 78. The representatives of the next of kin of the victims stated that: a) the Colombian Commission of Jurists, in face of the objections raised by the State in its brief with observations on reparations and at the public hearing, made several proposals at the latter to set legal costs and expenses. In the brief with their final arguments, the representatives proposed that legal costs and expenses be set by the Court in fairness, and supplementarily they 85 Cf. El Caracazo Case. Reparations, supra note 2, para. 128; Trujillo Oroza Case. Reparations, supra note 2, para. 118; and Benavides Cevallos Case. June 19, 1998 Judgment. Series C No. 38, para. 57. 86 87 Cf. processing file of the merits stage of Las Palmeras Case, sheets 831 to 856. The complete name is Specialized Identification Area of the National Identification Section of the Criminalistic Division of the Technical Investigative Corps of the Office of the Solicitor General of the Republic, Forensic Laboratory of the National Institute of Forensic Medicine.