<21. The Commission, in its brief on reparations, stated that it endorsed the evidence submitted by the representatives of the next of kin of the victims in the brief mentioned in the previous paragraph. 22. The State, in its brief on the reparations requested (supra para. 8), filed one document as evidence.8 23. The representatives of the next of kin of the victims submitted a number of documents requested by the Court as evidence to facilitate adjudication (supra paras. 4, 6 and 10).9 They also submitted several documents that had not been requested.10 24. The State also submitted the evidence requested to facilitate adjudication (supra paras. 4, 8 and 10).11 During the public hearing on reparations (supra para. 9), the Deputy Agent supplied a copy of a document,12 and witness Jorge Franclin Cuarán Muchavisoy supplied two videocassettes, one of which was shown before the Court during the hearing, as well as copies of fifteen documents.13 25. The representatives of the next of kin of the victims once again submitted documents backing expenses to substantiate the requests made together with their final arguments brief, as well as two additional documents.14 Those representatives also submitted, in accordance with the April 24, 2002 Order of the President, the written statements before a notary public made by Blanca Flor Rojas, Bladimir Cerón Rojas, María Adelina López, Carmen Leonor Pantoja López, Jaime Pantoja López, Luis Edmundo Pantoja Ordóñez, Carmen Cuarán Muchavisoy, Doris Silvia Cuarán Muchavisoy, and Umberto Enrique Cuarán Muchavisoy (supra paras. 5 and 7),15 summarized as follows: 8 Cf. evidence file received during the reparations phase in Las Palmeras Case, under the title “Prueba presentada por el Estado de Colombia junto con el escrito de observaciones a las reparaciones”, sheets 2328 to 2343. 9 Cf. evidence file received during the reparations phase in Las Palmeras Case, under the title “Prueba para mejor resolver presentada por los representantes de los familiares de las víctimas”, sheets 1728 to 1756, 1764 to 2024 and 2343 bis to 2345; and “Prueba para mejor resolver presentada por the Colombian Commission of Jurists mediante escrito de fecha 30 de julio de 2002,” sheets 3378 to 3568. 10 Cf. evidence file received during the reparations phase in Las Palmeras Case, sheets 1757 to 1763. 11 Cf. evidence file received during the reparations phase in Las Palmeras Case, under the title “Prueba aportada por el Estado de Colombia para mejor resolver”, sheets 2056 to 2327 and sheets 2346 and 2347; and “Prueba presentada por el Estado de Colombia mediante escrito de fecha 24 de julio de 2002, recibida en la Secretaría el 26 de julio de 2002”, sheets 2348 to 3377; and processing file of the reparations phase in Las Palmeras Case, Volume II, sheets 428 to 448. 12 Cf. processing file of the reparations phase in Las Palmeras Case, Volume II, sheets 366 to 368. 13 Cf. processing file of the reparations phase in Las Palmeras Case, Volume II, sheets 369 to 412. 14 Cf. processing file of the reparations phase in Las Palmeras Case, Volume II, sheets 475 to 476; and evidence file received during the reparations stage in Las Palmeras Case, under the title “Nueva relación de gastos de la Comisión Colombiana de Juristas presentada junto con su escrito de alegatos finales,” sheets 3569 to 4415. 15 2055. Cf. evidence file received during the reparations stage in Las Palmeras Case, sheets 2025 to