ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF OCTOBER 23, 2012 CASE OF VERA VERA ET AL. v. ECUADOR MONITORING COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGMENT HAVING SEEN: 1. The Judgment on preliminary objection, merits, reparations and costs (hereinafter “the Judgment”) delivered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Court” or “the Court”) on May 19, 2011. 2. The Order of the Court of February 27, 2012, in which it declared that: 1. In accordance with the relevant considering paragraphs of th[e] order, the State has complied fully with the following obligations: a) To publish certain paragraphs of the judgment in the Official Gazette, to publish the official summary thereof in a national newspaper with widespread circulation, and to publish the entire judgment on an appropriate official web site (third operative paragraph of the judgment). b) To pay the amounts established as compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, and for reimbursement of costs and expenses (fourth operative paragraph of the judgment). AND DECIDE[D]: 1. To rule on [the obligation to adopt, within a reasonable time, the necessary measures for the mother of Pedro Miguel Vera Vera to know what happened to her son, and the obligation to publish specific paragraphs of the Judgment, relating to the second and third operative paragraphs of the Judgment, respectively] after the Republic of Ecuador ha[d] presented its next report on compliance with the Judgment. 3. The brief of July 6, 2012, in which the Republic of Ecuador (hereinafter “the State” or “Ecuador”) presented information on compliance with the Judgment delivered by the Court in this case (supra having seen paragraph 1). The original version of this brief was received by this Court on August 6, 2012, together with a compact disc that had not been submitted previously. 4. In a note of the Secretariat of September 21, 2012, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Commission” or “the Commission”) and the representative of the victims (hereinafter “the representative”) were asked to present any observations they deemed relevant on the content of the said compact disc (supra having seen paragraph 3) by October 5, 2012, at the latest. 5. The brief of August 9, 2012, in which the representative presented their observations on the State’s brief on July 6, 2012, (supra having seen paragraph 3). The representative did not present observations on the content of the compact disc forwarded by the State on August 6, 2012.