14 been made. In this respect, the Court considers that it is not pertinent to request any further information on this matter. b) A term deposit certificate (TDC) has been established in favor of the minors, Iván Andrés Caballero Parra and Ingrid Carolina Caballero Martínez. However, the Court has observed that the conditions under which this investment was made still need to be monitored, because a single TDC was established in favor of two different individuals, of whom, one of them, the minor Ingrid Carolina, will attain her majority on the date that this certificate matures, on September 1, 2004. Moreover, when the investment was made, it was put in the name of the Ministry of Defense, which undertook, at the request of the representatives of the victims and their next of kin, to order the transfer of the money to an account to be opened in the name of each of the minors when the certificate matures. In this respect, since the minor Iván Andrés will not have attained his majority at the date of maturity, it was agreed that a new TDC would be established in the name of his representative. Consequently, the Court considers that this element (corresponding to the first operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations) is pending compliance and requests that, when the TDC matures on September 1, 2004, information should be provided on the transfers made and on the establishment of a new investment in favor of the minor Iván Andrés; and c) Payment of the amount corresponding to the reparation for compensation for non-pecuniary damage in favor of Ana Vitelma Ortiz, mother of María del Carmen Santana (paragraph 51 and first operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations) has been made. However, the documentation provided by the parties shows that the State has not paid the interest accumulated between the date of which the trust fund should have been set up in January 1998 and the effective date of payment in May 2001. In this respect, the Court considers that Colombia has complied with the payment of the sum of US$10,000.00 (ten thousand United States dollars) indicated by the Court in its judgment on reparations (supra second having seen paragraph), but requests the State to provide information on payment of the said interest. The Court considers that it is not pertinent to request any further information on the part of the obligation that has already been complied with. * 7. that: * * That, in the judgment on merits of December 8, 1995, the Court decided 5. [...] the Republic of Colombia [was] obligated to continue judicial proceedings into the disappearance and presumed death of the persons named and to extend punishment in accordance with internal law. 8. That, after examining the documentation presented by the parties, the Court has verified that, to date, those responsible for the disappearance of the victims have not been identified. In this respect, the State has conducted two criminal proceedings. The first began in 1989 and culminated in an acquittal in 1990, and the next of kin of the victims did not participate in it as procedural subjects. During the second proceeding, the procedural unity was interrupted when the investigation