4 a) the victim has not received payment of interest on the compensation awarded for moral damage; b) the State has made no reference to Mr. Cesti-Hurtado’s statement regarding the fact that he is not considered a victim but a witness in the investigation proceedings relating to the case. Furthermore, the Commission expressed regret over the lack of up-to-date information about the effective and tangible results of the measures adopted to investigate the facts of the instant case; c) the State must adopt all such measures as may be necessary to expedite compliance with the arbitration award in accordance with domestic law and the Arbitration Agreement of June 26, 2003; and d) the State is under the obligation to immediately and completely resolve the issue of the annulment of the military proceedings and the effects resulting therefrom. 10. The comments of Mr. Cesti-Hurtado of May 24, 2005 on the State report of March 11, 2005 (supra Having Seen clause No. 8), in which he stated that: a) although the Minister of Justice has sent an official letter to the Ministry of Economy to procure the funds necessary to pay the compensation owed by the State, there has not been any follow-up on said letter; b) the default interest payable by the State to the victim and his next of kin was not included in the State report; c) a new law on the FEDADOI has been passed that gives priority to the payment of compensation ordered in cases of human rights violations; however, his case has not been resolved despite repeated claim letters and a request for review; d) the State continues to protect those responsible for human rights violations committed against him. The duty to investigate, prosecute and punish those responsible for such human rights violations rests with the ad hoc Prosecutor’s Office for the case of Fujimori-Montesinos; however, the State has not adopted any measures regarding this matter; and e) he is awaiting confirmation of the results of the measures taken to have all criminal charges and proceedings regarding this case expunged from his record. 11. The communication of Mr. Cesti-Hurtado of August 10, 2005, whereby he informed the Court that on March 29, 2005 he filed a complaint with a Peruvian court against the State to enforce compliance with the judgments rendered by the InterAmerican Court in the instant case and with the Arbitration Award. Moreover, Mr. Cesti-Hurtado informed that the 37º Juzgado Civil de Lima (Thirty-seventh Civil Court in and for Lima) accepted the complaint and issued a writ of execution on State funds, which were at the Court’s disposal. Mr. Cesti-Hurtado also indicated that, as a result, the State launched a major press campaign against him and against the Thirty-seventh Judge.