a disagreement with the Court’s ruling, as they clearly declare their “disconformity” with the reparation measure ordered and seek to modify it. 29. The Court, having addressed the representatives’ questions regarding operative paragraphs 10, 12 and 16, declares their request inadmissible, with no points requiring clarification. V OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS 30. Therefore, THE COURT, In conformity with Article 67 of the American Convention on Human Rights and Articles 31.3 and 68 of the Court’s Rules of Procedure, DECIDES: unanimously, 1. To declare admissible the request for interpretation of the judgment on merits, reparations and costs, issued in the case of López Soto et al. v. Venezuela, filed by the victims’ representatives. 2. To clarify by means of interpretation the judgment on merits, reparations and costs issued in the case of López Soto et al. v. Venezuela, under the terms of paragraphs 16 and 17. 3. To declare inadmissible the request for interpretation of the judgment on merits, reparations and costs issued in the case of López Soto et al. v. Venezuela, submitted by the victims’ representatives, under the terms of paragraphs 21, 22, 28 and 29. 4. To order the Court Registrar to extend notification of this judgment of interpretation to the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, the victims’ representatives and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. 7