CONCURRING OPINION OF
JUDGE HUMBERTO ANTONIO SIERRA PORTO
INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
CASE OF THE FORMER EMPLOYEES OF THE JUDICIARY V. GUATEMALA
JUDGMENT OF NOVEMBER 17, 2021
(Preliminary objections, Merits and Reparations)
1.
With my customary respect for the decisions of the Inter-American Court of
Human Rights (hereinafter the Court), I issue this opinion in order to explain my partial
disagreement with the fourth operative paragraph in which the Court declared the
international responsibility of the State of Guatemala (hereinafter “the State” or
Guatemala) for the violation of the rights to strike, freedom of association, freedom to
organize and the right to work and to social security, in relation to the obligation to
respect and guarantee rights and the duty to adopt provisions of domestic law, to the
detriment of the 65 former employees of the Judiciary of Guatemala listed in the Single
Annex of the Judgment. This opinion complements the position I have already expressed
in my partially dissenting opinions in the cases of Lagos del Campo v. Peru, 1 Dismissed
Workers of Petroperú et al. v. Peru, 2 San Miguel Sosa et al. v. Venezuela, 3 Cuscul Pivaral
et al. v. Guatemala, 4 Muelle Flores v. Peru, 5 National Association of Discharged and
Retired Employees of the National Tax Administration Superintendence (ANCEJUBSUNAT) v. Peru, 6 Hernández v. Argentina, 7 Indigenous Communities Members of the
Lhaka Honhat (Our Land) Association v. Argentina 8, Guachalá Chimbo et al. v. Ecuador, 9
1
Cf. Case of Lagos del Campo v. Peru. Preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs. Judgment
of August 31, 2017. Series C No. 340. Partially dissenting opinion of Judge Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto.
2
Cf. Case of the Dismissed Workers of PetroPeru et al. v. Peru. Preliminary objections, merits,
reparations and costs. Judgment of November 23, 2017. Series C No. 344. Partially dissenting opinion of Judge
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto.
Cf. Case of San Miguel Sosa et al. v. Venezuela. Merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of February
8, 2018. Series C No. 348. Partially dissenting opinion of Judge Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto.
3
4
Cf. Case of Cuscul Pivaral et al. v. Guatemala. Preliminary objection, merits, reparations and costs.
Judgment of August 23, 2018. Series C No. 359. Partially dissenting opinion of Judge Humberto Antonio Sierra
Porto.
5
Cf. Case of Muelle Flores v. Peru. Preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of
March 6, 2019. Series C No. 375. Partially dissenting opinion of Judge Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto.
6
Cf. Case of the National Association of Discharged and retired Employees of the National Tax
Administration Superintendence (ANCEJUB-SUNAT) v. Peru. Preliminary objections, merits, reparations and
costs. Judgment of November 21, 2019. Series C No. 394. Partially dissenting opinion of Judge Humberto
Antonio Sierra Porto.
7
Cf. Case of Hernández v. Argentina. Preliminary objection, merits, reparations and costs. Judgment
of November 22, 2019. Series C No. 395. Partially dissenting opinion of Judge Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto.
Cf. Case of the Indigenous Communities Members of the Lhaka Honhat (Our Land) Association v.
Argentina. Merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of February 6, 2020. Series C No. 400. Partially dissenting
opinion of Judge Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto.
8
9
Cf. Case of Guachalá Chimbo et al. v. Ecuador. Merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of March 26,
2021. Series C No. 423. Partially dissenting opinion of Judge Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto.
1
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents