- 76 - 217. Furthermore, the results of the proceedings must be publicized so that Colombian society may know the truth about the facts.318 218. Lastly, the Court finds that the State must guarantee the safety of the next of kin of Senator Cepeda Vargas and ensure that they do not have to relocate or leave the country again, as a result of any possible threats, harassment or persecution against them following notification of this judgment. In addition, under its general obligations of guarantee contained in Article 1(1) of the Convention, the State must conduct and conclude, with due diligence and within a reasonable time, the investigations into the complaints of intimidation and threats filed by the next of kin at the domestic level; the State has provided information about the said investigations without indicating to which facts each one corresponds. Above all, it is essential that, when conducting the said investigations, the corresponding authorities make every effort to determine all the facts surrounding the threats and how they were expressed; they must also try and determine whether there has been a pattern of threats against the victims, or the group or entity to which they belong, as well as the object and purpose of the threats, the individual or individuals behind them and, if applicable, impose the penalties established by law.319 C. MEASURES OF SATISFACTION, REHABILITATION AND GUARANTEES OF NON- REPETITION 219. The Court will determine other measures that seek to repair the non-pecuniary damage and that are not of a pecuniary nature, and will order measures of public scope or repercussion.320 C.1 Satisfaction and non-repetition a) Publication of the judgment 220. The Commission requested the publication in a national newspaper of the judgment that the Court will eventually hand down, and the State accepted this. As ordered on other occasions,321 the Court finds that, as a measure of satisfaction, the State must publish once in the official gazette and in another national newspaper paragraphs 1 to 5, 13 to 23, 71 to 73, 85 to 87, 88, 100 to 102, 103, 114, 115, 122 to 126, 167, 175 to 177, 179, 180, 181, 194 to 196, 201, 202, 204, 209, 210, 216 to 218, 220, 223, 228, 233 and 235 of this judgment, including the headings of each chapter and of the respective section – without the corresponding footnotes – and the 318 Cf. El Caracazo v. Venezuela. Merits. Judgment of November 11, 1999. Series C No. 58, para. 118; Case of Radilla Pacheco v. Mexico, supra note 24, para. 334, and Case of Anzualdo Castro v. Peru, supra note 36, para. 183. 319 Cf. Carpio Nicolle v. Guatemala. Provisional measures. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of July 6, 2009, para. 24. 320 Cf. The “Street Children” (Villagrán Morales et al.) v. Guatemala. Reparations and costs. Judgment of May 26, 2001. Series C No. 77, para. 84; Case of the Dos Erres Massacre v. Guatemala, supra note 57, para. 255, and Case of Dacosta Cadogan v. Barbados, supra note 312, para. 99. 321 Cf. Case of the Gómez Paquiyauri Brothers v. Peru, supra note 220, Case of the Dos Erres Massacre v. Guatemala, supra note 57, para. 256, and Case of Radilla Pacheco v. Mexico, supra note 16, para. 350.