reparations have been ordered because the case continues under the Court's consideration until the State fully complies with the ruling. 33. Provisional measures, in this sense, "have taken on [...] great importance in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court, especially in the preventive aspect of the international protection of human rights. Moreover, at the present day they represent a preventative jurisdictional guarantee, and constitute one of the most rewarding aspects of the international safeguarding work of the fundamental rights of human beings."34 34. Considering the provisional measures largely "determine the effectiveness of the right to individual application at the international level," 35 which implies that the Court's decisions are implemented fully ensuring the effectiveness of the inter-American system and the protection of human rights it recognizes, the judges who subscribe this opinion reaffirm the constant jurisprudence of the Court in the sense that Article 63(2) of the American Convention grants the Court jurisdiction to order provisional measures whilst monitoring compliance with its judgments. Diego García-Sayán President Leonardo A. Franco Manuel E. Ventura Robles 34 Cançado Trindade, Antonio A., "Reflexiones sobre la evolución y estado actual de las medidas provisionales de protección en el derecho internacional contemporáneo," preface to the first edition by Cantor Rey, Ernesto and Rey Anaya, Ángela, supra note 27, p. XVII. XVII. 35 Cf. MacDonald, R. ST. J., “Interim measures in international law, with special reference to the European System for the Protection of Human Rights,” in Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, no. 52, 1993, p. 703. 12