Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of November 17, 2004 Case of Trujillo-Oroza v. Bolivia (Monitoring Compliance with Judgment) HAVING SEEN: 1. The Judgment on merits that the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Court” or “the Inter-American Court”) delivered on January 26, 2000, wherein it unanimously decided: 1. To accept the acquiescence to the facts and the acknowledgement of responsibility made by the State. 2. To declare, in accordance with the terms of the State’s acknowledgement of responsibility, that it [had] violated the rights protected by Articles 1(1), 3, 4, 5(1) and 5(2), 7, 8(1) and 25 of the American Convention on Human Rights to the detriment of the persons cited in paragraph 1 of [the] judgment, as set forth in that paragraph.. 3. To open the reparations proceedings and authorize the President to adopt the corresponding measures. 2. The Judgment on reparations, delivered by the Court on February 27, 2002, wherein it decided: unanimously, 1. That the State [was to] take all necessary measures to locate the mortal remains of the victim and deliver them to his next of kin, so that they [could] bury him appropriately, in the terms of paragraphs 115 and 117 of [the] judgment. 2. That the State [was to] define the forced disappearance of persons as an offense in its domestic legislation, in the terms of paragraph 98 of [the] judgment. 3. That the State [was to] investigate, identify and punish those responsible for the harmful facts that [were] the subject of the instant case, in the terms of paragraphs 109, 110 and 111 of [the] judgment. 4. That the State [was to] publish the judgment on merits of January 26, 2000, in the Official Gazette. 5. That, in accordance with Article 2 of the Convention, the State [was to] adopt those measures for the protection of human rights that ensure the free and full exercise of the rights to life, freedom and humane treatment, and to a fair trial and judicial protection, in order to avoid future harmful acts such as those of this case, in the terms of paragraphs 120 and 121 of [the] judgment. 6. That the State [was to] officially assign the name of José Carlos Trujillo Oroza to an educational establishment in Santa Cruz, in the terms of paragraph 122 of [the] judgment. 7. That, for non pecuniary damage, the State [was to] pay: a) the amount of US$100,000.00 (one hundred thousand United States dollars) or its equivalent in Bolivian currency, to Gladys Oroza de Solón