15 10. The Court will consider the general status of compliance with the February 27, 2002 Judgment on reparations once it receives the pertinent information regarding the measures still pending compliance. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, in exercise of its authority to monitor compliance with its rulings and in accordance with articles 33, 62(1), 62(3), 65, 67 and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, articles 25(1) and 30 of its Statute and Article 29(2) of its Rules of Procedure, DECIDES: 1. That based on the findings in ‘Considering’ paragraph eight of this Order, the State has complied with the terms of operative paragraphs seven, eight and four of the Judgment on reparations that the Court delivered on February 27, 2002, with regard to: a) payment of compensation owed to the victim’s mother and siblings for non pecuniary damages; b) payment of the three compensations owed to the victim’s mother for pecuniary damages; c) publication of the January 26, 2000 Judgment on merits in Bolivia’s Official Gazette; and d) adoption, “in accordance with Article 2 of the Convention, […of] those measures for the protection of human rights that ensure the free and full exercise of the rights to life, freedom and humane treatment, and to a fair trial and judicial protection, in order to avoid future harmful acts such as those of this case.” 2. That based on the finding in ‘Considering’ paragraph eight of this Order, the State has partially complied with operative paragraphs six and nine of the Judgment on reparations that this Court delivered on February 27, 2002, as regards: a) the official naming of an educational institution in the city of Santa Cruz after José Carlos Trujillo Oroza; and b) reimbursing the costs and expenses ordered for the victim’s mother, Mrs. Gladys Oroza de Solón Romero. 3. That it will continue to monitor compliance with the measures of reparation still pending in the present case, which are: a) the obligation to “take all necessary measures to locate the mortal remains of the victim and deliver them to his next of kin, so that they can bury him appropriately”; b) criminalization of forced disappearance in the domestic legal system;