103 2. The State violated the right to humane treatment embodied in Article 5(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to the general obligation to respect and safeguard the rights and freedoms established in Article 1(1) thereof, to the detriment of Elva Elisa Benítez Feliu de Goiburú, Rogelio Agustín Goiburú Benítez, Rolando Agustín Goiburú Benítez, Patricia Jazmín Goiburú Benítez, Rosa Mujica Giménez, Gladis Ester Ríos de Mancuello, Claudia Anahí Mancuello Ríos, Carlos Marcelo Mancuello Ríos, Ana Arminda Bareiro de Mancuello, Mario Mancuello, Ana Elizabeth Mancuello Bareiro, Hugo Alberto Mancuello Bareiro, Mario Andrés Mancuello Bareiro, Emilio Raúl Mancuello Bareiro, Fabriciana Villalba de Ramírez, Lucrecia Francisca Ramírez de Borba, Eugenia Adolfina Ramírez de Espinoza, Sotera Ramírez de Arce, Sara Diodora Ramírez Villalba, Mario Artemio Ramírez Villalba, Herminio Arnoldo Ramírez Villalba, Julio Darío Ramírez Villalba and María Magdalena Galeano, in the terms of paragraphs 95 to 104 of this judgment. 3. The State violated the right to a fair trial and to judicial protection embodied in Articles 8(1) and 25 of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to the general obligation to respect and safeguard the rights and freedoms established in Article 1(1) thereof, to the detriment of Agustín Goiburú Giménez, Carlos José Mancuello Bareiro, Rodolfo Ramírez Villalba, Benjamín Ramírez Villalba, and also of their next of kin, Elva Elisa Benítez Feliu de Goiburú, Rogelio Agustín Goiburú Benítez, Rolando Agustín Goiburú Benítez, Patricia Jazmín Goiburú Benítez, Rosa Mujica Giménez, Gladis Ester Ríos de Mancuello, Claudia Anahí Mancuello Ríos, Carlos Marcelo Mancuello Ríos, Ana Arminda Bareiro de Mancuello, Mario Mancuello, Ana Elizabeth Mancuello Bareiro, Hugo Alberto Mancuello Bareiro, Mario Andrés Mancuello Bareiro, Emilio Raúl Mancuello Bareiro, Fabriciana Villalba de Ramírez, Lucrecia Francisca Ramírez de Borba, Eugenia Adolfina Ramírez de Espinoza, Sotera Ramírez de Arce, Sara Diodora Ramírez Villalba, Mario Artemio Ramírez Villalba, Herminio Arnoldo Ramírez Villalba, Julio Darío Ramírez Villalba and María Magdalena Galeano, in the terms of paragraphs 111 to 133 of this judgment. 4. This judgment constitutes per se a form of reparation, in the terms of paragraphs 139 to 144, 156 to 160 and 163 hereof. AND ORDERS: Unanimously, that: 5. The State must immediately carry out the necessary procedures to activate and conclude effectively, within a reasonable time, the investigation to determine the masterminds and perpetrators of the acts committed to the detriment of Agustín Goiburú Giménez, Carlos José Mancuello Bareiro, Rodolfo Ramírez Villalba and Benjamín Ramírez Villalba, and also complete the criminal proceedings that have been filed. In addition, these results should be published by the State within a reasonable time. In this regard, in the terms of paragraphs 123 to 132 and 164 to 166 of the judgment, the State should adopt the necessary measures of a diplomatic or judicial nature to prosecute and punish all those responsible for the violations committed, furthering by all possible means the necessary extradition requests under the pertinent domestic norms or international law. Moreover, Paraguay and the other States Parties to the Convention should collaborate to eliminate the impunity of the violations committed in this case by the prosecution and, if applicable, punishment of those responsible and should collaborate in good faith,