ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS1 NOVEMBER 24, 2010 CASE OF THE DISMISSED CONGRESSIONAL EMPLOYEES (AGUADO - ALFARO ET AL.) v. PERU MONITORING COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGMENT. AND REQUEST FOR PROVISIONAL MEASURES HAVING SEEN: A) Monitoring Compliance with Judgment The Judgment on the preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs (hereinafter “the Judgment”), handed down by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Court” or “the Court” or “the Tribunal”) on November 24, 2006, in the case of the Dismissed Congressional Employees v. Peru. 1. 2. The request for interpretation of judgment submitted by one of the representatives of the victims and ruled inadmissible by the Inter-American Court on November 30, 2007, for failing to meet the standards of Article 67 of the Convention and 29(3) and 59 of the Rules of Procedure of the Tribunal in force at that time.2 3. The Order of the President of the Court at that time dated June 8, 2009, ruling to call a private hearing at Court headquarters in order for the Tribunal to obtain information from the Republic of Peru (hereinafter "the State" or “Peru") on the measures of reparation ordered in the judgment and the corresponding comments of the Inter-American Commission and the common interveners. 4. The hearing held on July 8, 2009, during the LXXXIII Regular Period of Sessions of the Tribunal, held at its seat,3 as well as the documents presented by the Commission and the State during the hearing. 5. The order handed down on November 20, 2009, in which the Tribunal ruled: 1 Judge Diego García-Sayán did not participate in the deliberation or signing of this Order due to his Peruvian nationality, pursuant to articles 19 of the Statute and 19 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court. Consequently, in order to monitor compliance with the Judgment in this case, Tribunal Vice President Judge Leonardo A. Franco has stood in as Acting President. 2 Case of the Dismissed Congressional Employees (Aguado - Alfaro et al.). v. Peru. Request for Interpretation of Judgment on the Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 30, 2007, Series C No. 174. 3 The hearing was attended by Francisco Ercilio Moura and Javier Mujica Petit of the Labor Aid Center of Peru (CEDAL in its Spanish acronym), common interveners of the representatives; for the Inter-American Commission, Ms. Lilly Ching Soto, adviser; and for the State, Ms. Delia Muñoz Muñoz, Specialized Supranational State’s Attorney, Mr. Rodolfo Reyna Salinas, Adviser to the President of the Congress of the Republic, Mr. Edgar Chauca López, Chief Legal Advisor to the Congress of the Republic, Ms. Erika Ramos Arteaga, Adviser of the Specialized Supranational Office of the State's Attorney, Ambassador Moisés Tambini de Valle, Chief of the Diplomatic Mission of Peru in Costa Rica, and Mr. Gustavo Lembcke and Mr. David Tejada, Minister and Second Secretary of the Peruvian Embassy in Costa Rica, respectively.