CEJIL

- Library
- Sign in

Previous 4 / 106 Next

Normal view

‐ 4 ‐

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Uwazi is developed by
CEJIL
Library
Login

Info
15Relationships

Search Tips

Search text

Type something in the search box to get some results.

I INTRODUCTION OF THE CASE AND PURPOSE OF THE DISPUTE 5
II PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT 7
III PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS 8
A. First preliminary objection: “Lack of competence ratione materiae”8
A.1.Arguments of the Commission and allegations of the parties 8
A.2. Considerations of the Court 10
B. Second preliminary objection: “Failure to exhaust domestic remedies” 11
B.1. Arguments of the Commission and allegations of the parties 11
B.2. Considerations of the Court 13
IV COMPETENCE 15
V EVIDENCE 15
A. Documentary, testimonial and expert evidence 15
B. Admission of the documentary evidence 16
C. Admission of the statements of the presumed victims and of the testimonial and expert evidence 17
VI FACTS17
A. Context in the department of Arauca 17
B. Events preceding the bombardment of December 13, 199819
C. The bombing of the village of Santo Domingo on December 13, 1998, and subsequent events 22
C.1. Undisputed facts22
C.2. Disputed facts 24
D. Displacement of the inhabitants of Santo Domingo 25
E. Sacking, pillaging and destruction of property 27
F. The investigations into the death and injury of the presumed victims owing to the bombing of the village of Santo Domingo and subsequent events 27
F.1.The military criminal and ordinary criminal jurisdictions27
F.2 Ordinary criminal jurisdiction 30
F.3. Disciplinary investigation 33
G. Contentious administrative proceeding 34
VII MERITS 36
VII-1 RIGHTS TO JUDICIAL GUARANTEES AND TO JUDICIAL PROTECTION 36
A. Arguments of the Commission and allegations of the parties36
A.1. State act called “acknowledgement of responsibility” 36
A.2 Regarding the domestic investigations and proceedings38
B. Considerations of the Court 40
B.1. Ruling on the purpose of this case and the State’s act called “acknowledgement of responsibility” 40
B.2. Obligation to investigate and the domestic proceedings 46
VII-2 RIGHTS TO LIFE, TO PERSONAL INTEGRITY AND TO MEASURES OF PROTECTION FOR THE CHILDREN, AND OBLIGATION TO ADOPT DOMESTIC LEGAL PROVISIONS52
A. Arguments of the Commission and allegations of the parties 52
A.1. Right to life 52
A.2. Right to personal integrity 53
A.3. Right to measures of protection for the children 53
A.4. Obligation to adopt domestic legal measures54
B. Considerations of the Court 55
B.1. The obligation to respect and guarantee the rights to life and to personal integrity and measures of protection for children 55
B.2. The launch of an AN-M1A2 cluster bomb on Santo Domingo57
B.3. The presumed machine gun attack 69
B.4. The alleged violation of measures of protection in favor of the children 70
B.5. The alleged violation of the right to integrity of the next of kin 3
B.6. The alleged failure to comply with Article 2 of the Convention 72
B.7. Conclusions 73
VII.3 RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT AND RESIDENCE, AND RIGHT TO PROPERTY73
A. Arguments of the Commission and allegations of the parties 73
A.1. Alleged violation of the right to freedom of movement and residence 73
A.2. Alleged violation of the right to property 3
B. Considerations of the Court 75
B.1. Freedom of movement and residence 75
B.2. Right to property 78
VII.4 RIGHT TO HONOR 82
A. Arguments of the Commission and allegations of the parties 82
B. Considerations of the Court 82
VIII REPARATIONS 83
A. Injured party 84
B. Obligation to investigate 85
C. Measures of satisfaction, rehabilitation and restitution, and guarantees of non-repetition 85
C.1. Measures of satisfaction 86
C.2. Rehabilitation measures 87
C.3. Other measures requested 88
D. Compensation 91
E. Costs and expenses 95
F. Means of complying with the payments ordered 96
IX OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS 97
ANNEX I. PERSONS DECEASED 100
ANNEX II. PERSONS INJURED. 101
ANNEX III. NEXT OF KIN OF DECEASED AND INJURED VICTIMS 102

Masacre de Santo Domingo. Judgment. November 30, 2012

IACourt judgment

Preview

Type

Costs
Merits
Preliminary Objections
Reparations

Date: Nov 30, 2012

Mechanism

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Number: C-259

Country

Colombia

Signatories

Alberto Pérez Pérez
Diego García-Sayán
Eduardo Vio Grossi
Leonardo A. Franco
Manuel E. Ventura Robles
Margarette May Macaulay
Rhadys Abreu Blondet

Primary Documents

Santo Domingo Massacre. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 30, 2012.pdf
English
Download View
Masacre de Santo Domingo. Excepciones Preliminares, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. Sentencia de 30 de noviembre de 2012.pdf
Spanish
Download View

Supporting files

Masacre de Santo Domingo. Excepciones Preliminares, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. Sentencia de 30 de noviembre de 2012.doc1.01 MB

Santo Domingo Massacre. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 30, 2012.doc6.42 MB

No References

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

País1
- Country1
Signatories6
- Judge and/or Commissioners6
Mecanismo1
- Mechanism1
IACourt Documents7
- Case1
- Order of the IACourt2
- Order of the President IACHR1
- IACourt judgment1
- Hearing2

Create Reference

Select relationship type

Relacionado a
CorteIDH
CIDH
Votos separados
Paises
Jueces intervinientes
País
Multi Select
Mecanismo
Firmantes
Sexo
Tipo
Firmante Voto separado
Estado
Descriptores
Geolocalización de los hechos del caso
Medidas de Protección

Search Tips

Notifications

You're all caught up

New activity will show up here.