127 vindicated at a public act, and for the police work of Rember Larios Tobar to be publicly recognized; d) to adopt the following measures: d.i) for the President of Guatemala and the Minister of Defense to publicly ask for the “forgiveness” of the Mack family for past and current human rights violations against the victim and her family; d.ii) for two annual scholarships to be established in the name of Myrna Mack Chang to maintain public recognition of the victim and the nature of her work. These scholarships must be granted to Guatemalan students to study Anthropology and Law at respected and internationally recognized universities, outside Guatemala. AVANCSO and the Myrna Mack Foundation must also participate in selecting the students. This reparation is especially appropriate due to the Myrna Mack Chang´s academic background and her devotion to promoting human rights. The scholarships should enable reproduction, to a certain extent, of the impact of the life of the victim on Guatemalan society; d.iii) for a monument to Myrna Mack Chang to be built, located in the region of Guatemala where she worked intensely. Considerations of the Court 271. The Court has concluded, inter alia, that Guatemala violated Articles 8 and 25, in combination with 1(1) of the Convention, to the detriment of the next of kin of the victim, due to deficient direction of the judicial proceedings, their delays, and the obstructions effected to impede punishment all those responsible, including direct perpetrators, accessories, participants and accomplices after the fact, which has generated feelings of insecurity, defenselessness, and anguish in the next of kin of the victim. 272. The Court recognizes that in the instant case impunity of those responsible is partial, as one of the direct perpetrators has been tried and punished (supra paras. 134.5 and 134.22). Nevertheless, at the time of the instant Judgment, after more than thirteen years, the criminal proceeding is ongoing and is pending a decision on an appeal for annulment, for which reason a definitive judgment has not yet been issued that identifies and punishes all those responsible for the extra-legal execution of Myrna Mack Chang. On the other hand, there has been a situation of grave impunity that constitutes an infringement of the aforementioned duty of the State (supra para. 217), that is injurious to the next of kin of the victim, and that fosters chronic recidivism of the human rights violations involved.291 273. This Court has repeatedly referred to the right of the next of kin of the victims to know what happened and to know who are the agents of the State responsible for 291 Cf. Bulacio Case, supra note 9, para. 120, Juan Humberto Sánchez Case, supra note 9, paras. 143 and 185; and Las Palmeras Case. Reparations, supra note 10, para. 53.a).