INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS CASE OF J. v. PERU JUDGMENT OF NOVEMBER 20, 2014 (Interpretation of the Judgement on Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs) In the case of J v. Peru, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Court,” “the Court,” or “the Tribunal”), composed of the following judges:1 Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto, President; Roberto F. Caldas, Vice President; Manuel E. Ventura Robles, Judge; Eduardo Vio Grossi, Judge; Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot, Judge; also present, Pablo Saavedra Alessandri, Secretary, and Emilia Segares Rodríguez, Deputy Secretary, in accordance with Article 67 of the American Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter also “the American Convention” or “the Convention”) and Article 68 of the Court’s Rules of Procedure (hereinafter also “the Rules”), resolves the request for interpretation of the judgment on Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations, and Costs issued by this Court on November 27, 2013, filed on March 17, 2014 by the victim's representative (hereinafter, “the representative”) and March 21, 2014 by the State of Peru (hereinafter, “Peru” or “the State”). Judge Diego García-Sayán, a Peruvian national, did not take part in the hearing and deliberation of this case in accordance with the provisions of Article 19(1) of the Court’s 1 Rules of procedure. Additionally, due to force majeure, Judge Alberto Pérez Pérez did not participate in the deliberation and signing of this judgment.