68. The plaintiffs petitioned the court on December 7, 2004, to order the defendant municipality to execute the judgment by issuing a mayoral executive order.97 The case file shows no evidence of a response to this petition. The case file was in the hands of the Santiago Court of Appeals from that date until January 23, 2008, and subsequently, in the Supreme Court as part of the examination of the process undertaken by the municipality of Chanco against the national treasury.98 The plaintiffs submitted a new brief in February, 2009, asking for the court to order the mayor to report on measures taken to execute judgment.99 They reiterated this petition on July 21, 2010.100 69. The Court of First Instance of Chanco delivered report 207-2010 on July 23, 2010, giving the mayor of Chanco a term of no more than ten days to report on measures being taken to execute the verdict.101 The case file shows no evidence of a response to this order by the municipality. The plaintiffs submitted an accounting report on the status of the debt on July 28, 2014, setting the figure at CLP 786,940,959.102 The defendant was served notice of this assessment on September 1, 2014.103 70. The municipality filed a brief on September 4, 2014, asking for a declaration of abandonment of the lawsuit.104 The court of Chanco responded to the municipality’s request on October 9, 2014, considering that “this process has culminated in a final, executed, appealable verdict, in which the procedure of accessory execution of judgment was not undertaken, and therefore abandonment of the lawsuit is out of order.”105 B.3. Process of Abarza Farías et al. v. the Municipality of Chanco, Docket No. 217-1993 71. The representative of a group of teachers from the municipality of Chanco lodged a petition on July 12, 1995106 with the Court of First Instance of Chanco, asking for accessory execution of the verdict delivered by the same court on January 26, 1993107 and upheld under a September 97 Cf. Brief filed by José Seda Navarrete on behalf of the plaintiffs before the Court of First Instance of Chanco, December 7, 2004 (evidence file, folio 16626). 98 Cf. Order by the Court of Chanco, January 23, 2008 (evidence file, folio 16646). 99 Cf. Brief filed by Giampero Fava Cohen on behalf of the plaintiffs before the Court of First Instance of Chanco on an illegible date in February 2009 (evidence file, folio 16647). 100 Cf. Brief filed by José Seda Navarrete on behalf of the plaintiffs before the Court of First Instance of Chanco, July 21, 2010 (evidence file, folio 16653). 101 Cf. Report 207-2010 issued by the Court of First Instance of Chanco on July 23, 2010 (evidence file, folio 16655). 102 Cf. Brief filed by Giampero Fava Cohen on behalf of the plaintiffs before the Court of First Instance of Chanco, July 28, 2014 (evidence file, folio 16674 and 16675). 103 Cf. Record of notice served on September 1, 2004. by D. Cerda, Judicial Process Server (evidence file, folio 16679). 104 Cf. Brief filed by Luis Alfredo Belmar Flores, on behalf of the municipality of Chanco before the Court of First Instance of Chanco, September 4, de 2014 (evidence file, folios 16685 and 16686). 105 Order by the Court of First Instance of Chanco, October 9, 2014 (evidence file, folio 16709 and 16710). 106 Cf. Brief filed by Humberto Franzani Soto on behalf of the plaintiffs before the Court of First Instance of Chanco, July 12, 1995 (evidence file, folio 15309). 107 Cf. Verdict by the Court of First Instance of Chanco, June 26, 1993 (evidence file, folios 15230 to 15245). 24