the assessment of the debt on November 11, 1994.133 The municipality objected to the assessment,134 but the court denied the objection.135 77. The plaintiffs petitioned the court in December, 1994, to order the issuing of a mayoral executive order to execute judgment136 and resubmitted their petition on December 28, 1994.137 The court delivered an order on December 29, 1994, requiring the municipality of Pelluhue to issue the mayoral executive order.138 The plaintiffs also requested that all the assets belonging to the municipality of Pelluhue be attached.139 The court denied this request and held that “municipal assets are not subject to attachment.”140 The plaintiffs lodged a motion for reconsideration with an appeal against this decision, arguing that, according to the Constitution of Municipalities, certain municipal assets are in fact subject to attachment as they are not designated for public use or for functions proper to municipal work.141 The court upheld the motion for reconsideration.142 The plaintiffs filed a brief on February 9, 1995, again requesting that the mayor be ordered to issue a mayoral executive order for payment.143 The court handed down an order on February 10, 1995, requiring the municipality of Pelluhue to issue the executive order.144 78. A new assessment of the settlement amount was added to the case file on October 24, 1995, setting the debt at CLP 554,108,639.145 The plaintiffs filed a brief on March 27, 1996, requesting enforcement of the verdict and payment of the amount owed.146 The court delivered an order on March 27, 1996, dismissing the petition as time-barred.147 133 Cf. Assessment prepared by the registrar and submitted to the Court of First Instance of Chanco on November 11, 1994 (evidence file, folios 15894 to 15899). 134 Cf. Brief filed by Benito Mancilla Pérez on behalf of the municipality of Pelluhue before the Court of First Instance of Chanco, November 15, 1994 (evidence file, folios 15902 and 15903). 135 Cf. Order by the Court of First Instance of Chanco, November 30, 1994 (evidence file, folios 15908 and 15909). 136 Cf. Brief filed by Humberto Franzani Soto on behalf of the plaintiffs before the Court of First Instance of Chanco, on an illegible date in December, 1994 (evidence file, folio 15915). 137 Cf. Brief filed by Humberto Franzani Soto on behalf of the plaintiffs before the Court of First Instance of Chanco, December 28, 1994 (evidence file, folio 15917). 138 Cf. Order by the Court of First Instance of Chanco, December 29, 1994 (evidence file, folio 15918). 139 Cf. Brief filed by Humberto Franzani Soto on behalf of the plaintiffs before the Court of First Instance of Chanco, January 17, 1995 (evidence file, folios 15919 and 15920). 140 Cf. Order by the Court of First Instance of Chanco, January 18, 1995 (evidence file, folio 15920). 141 Cf. Brief filed by Humberto Franzani Soto on behalf of the plaintiffs before the Court of First Instance of Chanco, January 21, 1995 (evidence file, folios 15921 and 15922). 142 Cf. Order by the Court of First Instance of Chanco, January 30, 1995 (evidence file, folio 15924). 143 Cf. Brief filed by Humberto Franzani Soto on behalf of the plaintiffs before the Court of First Instance of Chanco, February 9, 1995 (evidence file, folio 15925). 144 Cf. Order by the Court of First Instance of Chanco, February 10, 1995 (evidence file, folio 15926). 145 Cf. Assessment added to the case file on October 24, 1995 (evidence file, folio 15943 to 15971). 146 Cf. Brief filed by Humberto Franzani Soto on behalf of the plaintiffs before the Court of First Instance of Chanco, March 27, 1996 (evidence file, folio 15974). 147 Cf. Order by the Court of First Instance of Chanco, March 27, 1996 (evidence file, folio 15975). 27