of older persons, meaning more expeditious compliance with obligations to this vulnerable population. 209. In consequence, the Court orders the State to pay the amounts still owed, directly to the victims whose names are listed in Annex 1 or to their successors as defined by applicable domestic law, according to the amounts listed in Annex 2, in keeping with the financial report, “Current estimate of amounts outstanding for failure to comply with judicial findings delivered in the case of the teachers by the courts of Chañaral, Vallenar, Parral, Cauquenes and Chanco.” The amounts ordered for each victim should be updated at the time they are disbursed, based on the readjustment of the CPI determined by the National Bureau of Statistics between July 31, 2020 and the time payment is actually made, and the maximum interest rate allowed for readjustable operations as of that same date, according to the provisions of Article 63 of the Labor Code (supra para. 207), within the period set for that purpose (infra para. 232). C. Measures of satisfaction 210. The Commission offered no specific recommendations on this point. 211. The representatives asked that the State be declared in violation of Articles 1(1), 2, 8, 21, 25 and 26 of the Convention for all the victims, which in itself would be a form of redress. They also asked that the State be ordered to publish the authorized summary of the judgment in a widely circulated national newspaper, as well as the full judgment on the websites of relevant government institutions, especially the Ministry of Home Affairs, the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Foreign Relations, for one year. 212. They asked for a ceremony of recognition of international responsibility, with the participation of all high government authorities, including the president of the republic, the presidents of the Senate, the Chamber of Deputies and the Supreme Court, and government ministers, especially the Minister of Home Affairs and Security, Minister of Foreign Relations and Minister of Education. The details of the ceremony must be coordinated with the alleged victims, and it must be well publicized. 213. The State maintained that it could not be held responsible for violating Articles 1(1), 2, 8, 21 and 25 of the Convention and therefore the violation of these articles should not be declared. It added that the Commission’s Merits Report made no reference to Article 26 of the Convention, and reiterated that therefore it should be declared inadmissible. It made no reference to the publications or the recognition ceremony. C.1. Publication of the judgment 214. The Court orders, as it has done in other cases,453 that the State must produce the following publications within six months of the date of notification of this judgment: (a) the official summary of this judgment prepared by the Court, to run only once in the Official Gazette and in a newspaper with broad national circulation, using a font that is legible and appropriate, and (b) this judgment in its entirety, available for a period of one year on a website of the State, in such a way that it is accessible to the public and can be located from the homepage. The State should report to this Court as soon as it has proceeded with each of the publications ordered, regardless of the oneyear term to submit its first report as ordered in the operative section of this judgment. 453 Cf. Case of Cantoral Benavides v. Peru. Reparations and Costs. Judgment of December 3, 2001. Series C No. 88, para. 79, and Case of Vera Rojas et al. v. Chile, supra, para. 169. 69