through its tolerance, acquiescence or direct involvement in the attack suffered by Joe Castillo and his family, or that it failed in its obligation to prevent the events that took place against the aforesaid persons, or that their rights to judicial guarantees and judicial protection were violated. VII OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS THEREFORE, THE COURT DECLARES: Unanimously, that 1. The State did not violate the rights to life, to personal integrity and the rights of the child established in Articles 4, 5(1) and 19 of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to Article 1(1) of that instrument, under the terms of paragraphs 115 and 132 of this Judgment. 2. The State did not violate the rights to judicial guarantees and protection established in Articles 8 and 25 of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to Article 1(1) thereof, under the terms of paragraphs 171 and 172 of this Judgment. 3. The State did not violate the rights to personal integrity, honor and dignity, freedom of thought and expression and freedom of association established in Articles 5, 11(1), 13 and 16, respectively, of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to Article 1(1) of that instrument, under the terms of paragraph 184 of this Judgment. 4. Given that the international responsibility of the State has not been established, it is not appropriate for the Court to rule on reparations, costs and expenses. 46