12). 15. On July 14, 2011, following the instructions of the President of the Court, the Secretariat asked the Inter-American Commission, the representatives, and the States for clarifications on certain documents provided by the parties as evidence in this case. 16. On June 14 and 18, 2011, the State presented the remaining annexes to its final written arguments, as well as the information the Tribunal requested during the public hearing. 17. On July 18, 2011, the representatives submitted to the Court the clarifications that had been requested by the President (supra para. 15), as well as their observations to the additional information submitted by the expert witness Sofía Tiscona (supra para. 13). 18. On July 19, 2011, the State submitted to the Court some of the documents that had been requested by the President as evidence to facilitate adjudication, as well as the clarifications requested by the President (supra para. 15). 19. On July 21, 2011, the Inter-American Commission presented its comments on certain documentation submitted by the State through its final written arguments, and the clarifications requested by the President (supra paras. 12 and 15). 20. On July 22, 2011, following instructions of the President of the Court, the Secretariat requested that the parties present their observations to the clarifications filed by the Commission, the representatives, and the State, respectively (supra paras. 17, 18, and 19). 21. On August 4, 2001, the representatives presented their observations to the documentation submitted by the State through its final written arguments, on the documentation related to the information that the Court requested of the State during the public hearing, and to the evidence to facilitate adjudication and clarification requested of the State (supra paras. 10, 12 and 18). That same day, the State submitted its observations to the clarification requested by the Court from the InterAmerican Commission and the representatives (supra para. 20), and the Commission indicated that it had no observations. 22. On August 11, 2011, following the instructions of the President of the Court, the Secretariat asked the State for its observations regarding the Legal Aid Fund’s file on expenses. On August 18, 2011, the State indicated that it had no observations. 23. On August 21, 2011, the representatives filed a brief, by which the Court was informed about the occurrence of supervening facts. 24. On August 24, 2011, the Secretariat, following instructions of the President, requested the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the State to present their observations to the brief of the representatives regarding the supervening facts (supra para. 23). 25. On August 25 and 26, 2011, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the State, respectively, filed the observations requested regarding the supervening facts reported by the representatives (supra para. 24). 7