99 State lacks the personnel or institutions that may offer this level of necessary care, it must have recourse to specialized private or civil society institutions. When providing this treatment, the specific circumstances and needs of each victim must be considered, so that they are offered individual and family treatment, as agreed upon by each of them, and following an individual evaluation.383 Lastly, this treatment must be provided, insofar as possible, in the institutions nearest to their place of residence. In the same way, those who requested this measure of reparation, or their legal representatives, have six months from the notification of this Judgment to inform the State of their specific requests for psychological or psychiatric treatment. 269. In addition, the Court notes that Mrs. Elena Gibertini Castiglia, mother of disappeared person Líbero Giancarlo Castiglia, resides in the city of San Lucido, Italia,384 and, as such, will not have access to public health services in Brazil, pursuant to that ordered in the present section. Therefore, the Court considers it pertinent to determine that, if Mrs. Gibertini Castiglia requests medical, psychological or psychiatric care, in the terms of the prior paragraph, the State must offer her the amount of US$ 7,500.00 (seven thousand, five hundred dollars of the United States of America) for expenses related to medical and psychological or psychiatric care, in order for her to receive care in the place where she resides.385 2. Satisfaction i. Publication of the Judgment 270. The Commission requested the Court to order the State to publish the Judgment that the Court will render in a newspaper of national circulation. 271. The representatives requested the Court to order the State to publish the chapters of the Judgment related to the facts proven, the Articles of the Convention that were violated, and the operative part of the Judgment in its Official Gazette and in a newspaper of wide national circulation. In addition, they requested the publication of a book with the entire content of the Judgment. 272. The State indicated that this request could only be headed to if there was a condemnatory judgment by the Court. 273. As it has ordered on other occasions,386 the Court considers that, as a measure of satisfaction, the State must publish once in the Official Gazette, the present Judgment, including the respective titles and subtitles of each chapter, without the corresponding footnotes, and the operative paragraphs hereto. Likewise, the State must: a) publish the official summary of the Judgement issued by the Court in a newspaper with widespread national circulation, and b) 383 Cf. Case of 19 Tradesmen. Merits, Reparations and Costs, supra note 302, para. 278; Case of Fernández Ortega et al., supra note 53, para. 252, and Case of Rosendo Cantú et al., supra note 45, para. 253. 384 Cf. Statement by Mrs. Elena Gibertini Castiglia rendered before a public notary, supra note 345, folio 1645. 385 Cf. Case of the Miguel Castro-Castro Prison, supra note 254, para. 450, and Case of Tibi v. Ecuador. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of September 7, 2004. Series C No. 114, para. 249. 386 Cf. Case of Barrios Altos. Reparations and Costs, supra note 382, Operative Paragraph 5(d); Case of Rosendo Cantú et al., supra note 45, para. 229, and Case of Ibsen Cárdenas and Ibsen Peña, supra note 24, para. 244.