114 253. In accordance with its constant practice, the Court retains the authority emanating from its jurisdiction and the provisions of Article 65 of the American Convention, to monitor full compliance with this judgment. The instant case shall be closed once the State implements in full the provisions herein. Perú shall, within a year, submit to the Court a report on the measures adopted in compliance with this Judgment. XIII OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS 254. Therefore, THE COURT, DECIDES: Unanimously 1. To admit the acknowledgement of international liability made by the State for the violation of the rights protected under Articles 4, 5 and 7 of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to the obligation to respect rights provided for in Article 1(1) thereof, to the detriment of Muñoz Sánchez, Dora Oyague-Fierro, Marcelino RosalesCárdenas, Bertila Lozano-Torres, Luis Enrique Ortiz-Perea, Armando Richard Amaro-Cóndor, Robert Edgar Teodoro-Espinoza, Heráclides Pablo-Meza, Juan Gabriel Mariños-Figueroa and Felipe Flores-Chipana, as set forth in paragraphs 40, 41, 43, 44 and 52 of the instant Judgment. 2. To accept the partial acknowledgement of international liability made by the State for the violation of the rights to a fair trial and judicial protection established in Articles 8(1) and 25 of the American Convention, in relation to the obligation to respect the rights enshrined in Article 1(1) thereof, as set forth in paragraphs 40 to 44 and 53 of the instant Judgment. DECLARES: Unanimously that: 3. The State violated the rights protected in Articles 4(1), 5(1) and 5(2) and 7 of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to the obligation to respect rights provided for in Article 1(1) thereof, to the detriment of Muñoz Sánchez, Dora Oyague-Fierro, Marcelino Rosales-Cárdenas, Bertila Lozano-Torres, Luis Enrique Ortiz-Perea, Armando Richard Amaro-Cóndor, Robert Edgar Teodoro-Espinoza, Heráclides Pablo-Meza, Juan Gabriel Mariños-Figueroa and Felipe Flores-Chipana, as set forth in paragraphs 81 to 98 and 109 to 116 of the instant Judgment. 4. No facts allow this Court to conclude that the State violated the right to juridical personality established in Article 3 of the American Convention on Human Rights, for the reasons detailed in paragraphs 117 to 121 of the instant Judgment.