31 consider them as alleged victims since their existence was informed to the Court, at least indirectly, through the appendixes to the application. 77. Regarding the four persons listed by the representatives in their brief of requests and arguments (supra para. 69), the Court finds that such persons are mentioned in the affidavits made by the next of kin. Besides, and as evidence to facilitate the adjudication of the case, the representatives submitted the birth certificate of two of said persons. The state has not objected such request, which was included again in the written closing arguments of the Commission and the representatives. Then, the Court shall analyze their condition as as alleged victims in the corresponding paragraphs. 78. As regards Carol Denisse Muñoz-Atanasio, who seems to be the daughter and heir of Hugo Muñoz-Sánchez (supra para. 71), the Court does not know the reasons why said person has not been included as next of kin of the alleged victim neither by the InterAmerican Commission nor by the representatives. In spite of this, she shall be considered alleged victim since her existence was made known to the Court by the State, at least indirectly, in the appendixes attached to its closing arguments. 79. Finally, according to the affidavits executed by the next of kin of the alleged victims, and pursuant to the written closing arguments of the Commission (supra para. 70), there are other two next of kin, to wit, Nicolasa León-Espinoza, the alleged grandmother of Robert Edgar Teodoro-Espinoza, and Valeria Noemí Vajarro, the alleged niece of Armando Richard Amaro-Cóndor. In connection with this, the Court finds that in the affidavits submitted, said persons are mentioned, without any other information regarding their possible kinship, and that in the written closing arguments the Commission did not give any ground for including them as next of kin of the said alleged victims, but it only mentioned them. Therefore, the Court shall not consider them alleged victims. VII PROVEN FACTS 80. Upon examining the evidentiary elements filed in the instant case, the statements of the parties, as well as the admission of the facts and acknowledgement of international liability made by the State (supra paras. 51 and 58), the Court finds the following facts to be proven:16 16 Paragraphs 80(1) to 80(66) of this Judgment refer to undisputed facts that this Court deems to be proven based on the admission of facts and acknowledgement of liability made by the State, in the order and as described in the application. Proof of some of said facts has been completed with other evidentiary elements, which have been indicated in the corresponding footnotes. Furthermore, different paragraphs refer to facts taken from the Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, in which case the corresponding footnotes have also been included. Besides, paragraphs 80(67) to 80(92), which deal with the pending criminal proceedings, refer to facts that this Court deems to be proven on the grounds of the State´s acquiescence of liability and the evidentiary elements gathered in the records of the domestic criminal proceedings, the majority part of which have been submitted by the Commission as appendixes to the application, as well as evidence to facilitate the adjudication of the case presented by the State. Finally, paragraphs 80(93) to 80(110), dealing with the next of kin, refer to the facts that are deemed proven on the basis of the following evidence: official documents (birth, marriage and death certificates), affidavits made by the next of kin and documents submitted as evidence to facilitate the adjudication of the case.