7 14), reveals the sense and reach of the provisional measures of protection ordered by this Tribunal and the appropriateness of its good efforts. Regarding the procedures of the provisional measures, the disposition of the parties is necessary for the suitable coordination of the measures, with full participation of the beneficiaries in the determination of the risks and the measures to reduce those risks. * * * 16. That this Tribunal is concerned with analyzing two situations in the present measures to evaluate whether they should be maintained: a) the situation of the persons that reside outside of the territory of Colombia, meaning: Wilson Gutiérrez Soler, Kevin Daniel Gutiérrez Niño, Ricardo Gutiérrez Soler, Yaqueline Reyes, Leonardo Gutiérrez Rubiano, Ricardo Gutiérrez Rubiano, Sulma Tatiana Gutiérrez Rubiano, Paula Camila Gutiérrez Reyes and Luisa Fernanda Gutiérrez Reyes; and b) the situation of the persons that reside within Colombian territory, meaning: María Elena Soler, Carlos Andrés Gutiérrez Rubiano and Leydi Caterin Gutiérrez Peña. The aforementioned must make an agreement regarding the situation of extreme gravity and urgency in order to avoid irreparable damages to their rights to life, integrity, and personal liberties, as dictated in the Order of November 27, 2007 (Supra Having Seen 3). 17. That as an end to maintain the provisional measures ordered in this matter, it is necessary that the situation accredited with extreme gravity and urgency, and necessary to avoid irreparable damages have validity, as well as a direct relationship with the acts that motivated the granting of the provisional measures in the present case,9 for which, before the requirements of the Court to evaluate the maintenance of the measures, such information must be duly accredited and based.10 * * * 18. That in relation with the persons that reside outside of the territory of Colombia, the representatives have repeatedly informed of the will of some of the beneficiaries to return to the country. This has been valued by this Tribunal in previous occasions with the purpose of maintaining in effect the provisional measures ordered in the present matter. 19. That previous to the meeting held between the state authorities, the representatives, and Mr. Gutiérrez Soler (Supra Considering 14), the State informed and reiterated, in a general manner, its promise to adopt measures of protection during the temporary returns made by the beneficiaries to Colombian territory; for this, there is a need that the beneficiaries inform the authorities charged with the implementation of the measures properly and with sufficient anticipation of their return. Also, the State 9 Cf. Case of the Constitutional Court. Provisional Measures regarding Peru. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of March 14, 2001, Considering thirteenth; Matter of Leonel Rivera et al. Provisional Measures regarding Mexico. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of November 25, 2008, Considering twenty-third; and Case of Lopez Alvarez et al. Provisional Measures regarding Honduras. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of January 26, 2009, Considering twenty-fifth. 10 Cf. Case of Lopez Alvarez et al., supra note 9, Considering twenty-fifth.