6 11. That with regards to the pending compliance with operative paragraph four of the Judgment (supra Having Seen 1) regarding delivery of the American Convention in Maya Achí language to the victims and its publication in the Municipality of Rabinal, in the brief of November 25, 2008 the State reported that through the Academy of Mayan Languages 51 Articles of that Convention had been translated into Maya Achí (supra Having Seen 4). Additionally, in that same brief the State informed that: “[…] it is looking for the appropriate mechanisms to perform a public ceremony in the community of Rabinal, department of Baja Verapaz, to publish and deliver the judgment in its ‘popular version’, the [A]merican [C]onvention […]”. 12. That the representatives of the victims observed that “the process for publication of the text of the American Convention to the victims is still pending[, and that] the ‘popular version’ [delivered] only includes the contents of both judgments, and does not include the American Convention yet[,] therefore they are waiting for the process of delivery [of the American Convention] to the surviving victims and families to take place […] and the establishment of an agreement with the beneficiaries and their representatives, on the best way to comply with the publication of those texts.” 13. That the Commission manifested in its observations that it takes cognizance of “the information presented by the State with regards to holding a public ceremony to publish and deliver the texts.” Additionally, it reiterated the need for coordination with the injured party. 14. That the Court takes cognizance of that reported by the State. However, it observes that it did not submit information on the actions performed to deliver the text of the American Convention to the victims nor for its publication in the Maya Achí language in the Municipality of Rabinal, in conformity with operative paragraph four of the Judgment. Therefore, in view of the foregoing and taking into consideration that indicated by the representatives and the Commission, the State must report specifically on the steps implemented to comply with the aforementioned measures still pending compliance. * * * 15. That in relation to operative paragraph five of the Judgment (supra Having Seen 1), with regards to the publication of certain parts of the Judgment on Reparations in Spanish and Maya Achí in the Official Gazette and another newspaper of national circulation, in the brief of November 25, 2008 the State manifested that it has complied with this paragraph, since it published the Judgment in both Spanish and Maya Achí languages in the newspaper “El Periódico” and also in Maya Achí in the “Diario de Centroamérica,” official newspaper of Guatemala (supra Having Seen 4). It added that it reported on compliance with this operative paragraph to the representatives of the victims. The State submitted a copy of these publications. 16. That the representatives informed that the State had fully complied with operative paragraph five of the Judgment, and that they were waiting for a ceremony to be performed by the State to deliver the newspaper publications to the surviving victims and families. 17. That the Commission assessed the publication performed by the State with regards to operative paragraph five of the Judgment.