7 18. That based on the information submitted by the State and the representatives, as well as the analysis of the evidence presented, this Court has verified compliance with operative paragraph five of the Judgment. * * * 19. That in relation to operative paragraph six, regarding the payment of the amount awarded in the Judgment on Reparations (supra Having Seen 1) for infrastructure maintenance and improvements to the memorial chapel, the State informed that it made that payment at the headquarters of the “Comisión Presidencial Coordinadora de la Política del Ejecutivo en materia de derechos humanos” or Presidential Commission for Coordination of the Executive Branch’s Policy on Human Rights Issues (hereinafter “COPREDEH”) through the delivery of a check for the amount indicated in the Judgment and granted to the president of the “Asociación Comunitaria de Vecinos Sobrevivientes dieciocho de julio del ochenta y dos” (Community Association of the Survivors of July 18, 1982). This act was performed in the presence of the President of COPREDEH, a representative of CALDH, and two representatives of the Plan de Sánchez Community. The State submitted the corresponding payment release document. 20. That the representatives informed that, as indicated by the State, the amount awarded for infrastructure maintenance and improvements of the chapel was delivered. 21. That the Commission, in its observations, valued the payment performed by the State for maintenance and improvements to the chapel, in compliance with this operative paragraph. 22. That based on the information submitted by the parties and the analysis of the evidence provided, this Court has verified that the State has complied with operative paragraph six of the Judgment. * * * 23. That with regards to operative paragraph seven, related to the rendering of medical and psychological services and supply of medications, on August 28, 2008, the State informed that it has provided psychological attention through the Center for Permanent Attention of Rabinal, Baja Verapaz, of the Ministry of Health and Social Assistance. It also indicated that it has appointed medical personnel and psychologists, and performed a series of activities in seven communities. It added that although the Judgment ordered for mental health services to be provided in thirteen communities, the State performed a “diagnosis” whereby it was determined that “there are beneficiaries of the Judgment only in seven communities.” 24. That in relation to the psychological attention the representatives expressed, in the report submitted on October 24, 2008, that the attention provided was not ideal, given that the designated personnel did not have the necessary knowledge of “the [c]ontext prior to violence in that region (Rabinal), general aspects of the culture[,] the facts of the massacre [and] the necessary knowledge with regards to attention to the victims of political violence,” which has generated mistrust and lack of “empathy” by the victims. That with regards to medical attention, they expressed the need for diagnosis of each of the beneficiaries “as a starting point for any treatment that may be provided”, and also