10 Court finds that the State has complied fully with the obligation to pay the compensation for non-pecuniary damage in favor of the victims and the costs and expenses of the proceedings, pursuant to the fifteenth operative paragraph, sub-paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f), and the sixteenth operative paragraph. Regarding the said payments, the representatives argued that the State had not paid the corresponding interest and the Court will now refer to this matter. 27. That, as regards the payment of the interest corresponding to the amounts indicated in paragraphs 24, 25 and 26 of this Order, based on the observations of the representatives and the provisions established in paragraphs 2784 and 2795 of the judgment, according to which the State must “pay interest on the amount owed, in accordance with the bank interest rate on arrearages in Ecuador,” should the payment of compensation not be made within the year following notification of the judgment, the Court finds it essential that the State refer to the observations of the representatives on the alleged failure to pay interest and submit any information it deems pertinent in this regard. * * * 28. That the Court assesses that the fourteenth operative paragraph, subparagraphs (a) and (c), and the fifteenth and sixteenth operative paragraphs have been complied with totally, and that the twelfth operative paragraph has been complied with partially. It also recognizes the measures taken with regard to the thirteenth operative paragraph of the judgment, which constitute a relevant advance by the State in the execution and implementation of the Court’s judgment. 29. That the Court will consider the general status of compliance with the judgment on preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs of September 7, 2004, when it has received pertinent information on the aspects of the reparations that are pending compliance. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, in exercise of its authority to monitor compliance with its decisions and in accordance with Articles 67 and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, 25(1) and 30 of its Statute, and 30(2) of its Rules of Procedure,6 4 It establishes that “[i]f the State incurs arrearages, it shall pay interest on the amount owed in accordance with the bank interest rate on arrearages in Ecuador. 5 It establishes that “[a]s was established and has been the practice in all the cases it has heard, the Court will oversee compliance with all aspects of this judgment. This oversight is inherent in the jurisdictional authority of the Court and is necessary for due observance, by the Court itself, of Article 65 of the Convention. The case will be closed once the State has fully complied with all aspects of the ruling. Within one year of notification of this judgment, the State shall submit its first report to the Court on measures taken to comply with the judgment.” 6 Adopted by the Court during its forty-ninth regular session held from November 16 to 25, 2000, and partially amended by the court at its eighty-second regular session held from January 19 to 31, 2009, which is applicable in the instant case.