310. According to the information forwarded by the State in this case, the Court takes note of the advances made by the State in the process of reforming the Venezuelan policing model. Among other matters, the Court underlines the following: (1) the 2006 establishment of the National Commission for Police Reform (CONAREPOL) in order to make a diagnosis of the Venezuelan police forces; 395 (2) the approval, in 2008, of the Organic Law of the Police Service and the Bolivarian National Police Force, establishing the progressive and differentiated use of force by the police as a tool for police agents in their interactions with the population; 396 (3) the creation, in 2009, of the Police Council, with the functions of providing advice on and taking part in the definition, planning and coordination of public policies on policing; 397 (4) the creation, in 2009, of the Universidad Nacional Experimental de Seguridad, 398 with the task of training police agents in keeping with the new Venezuela policing model, and (5) the elaboration and distribution, starting in 2010, of a collection of self-instruction manuals called “Baquías,” [Skills Manuals] designed to establish institutional management indicators that allow each police force, autonomously, to evaluate the level of compliance with the reform processes. 399 311. In addition, regarding measures to ensure effective accountability, the Court notes that the Law on the Statute of the Police Function establishes that police agents shall respond in the disciplinary, administrative, civil and criminal sphere for wrongful acts, offenses, errors and administrative irregularities committed in the exercise of their functions. 400 In addition, this law establishes the Office to Control Police Actions, the Office to Respond to Police Irregularities, and the Police Disciplinary Council as internal control bodies for the police, 401 and encourages the creation of citizen committees to oversee the police, community councils and any other organization of a community nature duly structured as a body for the external oversight of the police. 402 eleventh operative paragraph; (3) in the case of the Barrios Family, the Court ordered the Venezuelan State to organize training courses on human rights for members of the police force of the state of Aragua. Cf. Case of the Barrios Family, supra, para. 341, and (4) in the case of Uzcátegui the Court did not find it necessary to order a guarantee of non-repetition, in view of the efforts made by the State to enhance the institutional capacity of security agents, in keeping with the principles and norms for the protection of human rights. Cf. Case of Uzcátegui et al., supra, para. 265. In addition, the Court has issues the following Orders on monitoring compliance with judgment: Case of El Caracazo v. Venezuela. Monitoring compliance with judgment. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of July 6, 2009, declaratory paragraph 2.d), and Case of Montero Aranguren et al. (Retén de Catia) v. Venezuela. Monitoring compliance with judgment. Order of the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights, August 30, 2011, declaratory paragraph 2.e). In the Case of the Barrios Family, the Court has not yet issued an order on monitoring compliance with the measures that the State was ordered to take in the judgment in this case. 395 Cf. National Commission for Police Reform created on April 10, 2006 (file of helpful evidence, folio 13982). 396 Cf. Decree No 5,895, with the rank, value and force of Organic Law of the Police Service and the Bolivarian National Police Force (file of helpful evidence, folio 10914). 397 Cf. Creation of the Police Council (file of helpful evidence, folio 13943). 398 Cf. Creation of the Universidad Nacional Experimental de Seguridad (file of helpful evidence, folio 13943). 399 Cf. Baquías 1 to 10 (file of helpful evidence, folios 11434, 11510, 11682, 11758, 11834, 11934, 12058, 12134, 12210 and 12286, respectively); Baquías 12, 14 to 16 and 19 (file of helpful evidence, folios 12362, 12438, 12514, 12580 and 12704, respectively). 400 Article 11 of the Law on the Statute of the Police Function establishes that “Police agents shall respond in the disciplinary, administrative, civil and criminal sphere for wrongful acts, offenses, errors and administrative irregularities committed in the exercise of their functions pursuant to the law, regulations and resolutions” (file of helpful evidence, folio 10866). 401 Article 75 of the Law on the Statute of the Police Function establishes that “The following are internal oversight mechanisms of the police: the Office to Control Police Actions, the Office to Respond to Police Irregularities, and the Police Disciplinary Council” (file of helpful evidence, folio 10886). 402 Article 83 of the Law on the Statute of the Police Function establishes that “The external oversight mechanisms of the police, pursuant to article 81 of the Organic Law of the Police Service and the Bolivarian National Police Force, are the citizen committees to oversee the police, community councils, and any other organization of a community nature duly structured that can contribute to improving the procedures, performance and productivity of the police within the framework of the constitutional and legal norms” (file of helpful evidence, folio 10888). 86