existing courses, the information provided reveals that it has not even made a retrospective analysis of the training courses provided to the members of the Armed Forces […].” They considered it important that these courses include “the obligation of all the authorities to collaborate in gathering evidence and guaranteeing access to information in cases of grave human rights violations.” Regarding the projected course “Application of national and international human rights law in proceedings for grave violations in Guatemala,” the representatives observed that it is “crucial that the training be addressed at influencing and improving the work of prosecutors and their assistants[, as well as providing them] with tools that allow them to conduct investigations effectively and within a reasonable time.” Lastly, the representatives indicated that “the State has never refer[red] to the measures it has adopted to train judges.” 26. The Commission appreciated the initiatives taken by the State; however, it observed that, based on “the information available, it cannot be concluded that the State is complying adequately with this aspect of the judgment.” Thus, it noted that “the State had not forwarded information regarding the results of the measures taken to offer training on human rights to justice operators in Guatemala,” and also that “despite the pensum on human rights included at the different training levels of the Armed Forces, the Court had specified in its judgment that the scope of this obligation included the creation of a permanent education program on human rights for members of the Armed Forces, judges and prosecutors, independently of, or to strengthen, those that already exist.” Furthermore, it indicated that the State must remove “all the obstacles that prevent or delay compliance with its obligations, including the allocation of the necessary financial, human and any other resources to train and strengthen the system of justice in Guatemala comprehensively.” Lastly, it indicated that the “six-month term granted for complying with this obligation has expired without effective compliance being achieved.” 27. According to the information presented by the parties, the Court observes that even though the State has taken some measures relating to the implementation of training courses, particularly measures regarding the elaboration of the project to offer the course “Application of national and international human rights law in proceedings for grave violations in Guatemala,” it also considers that these measures have been insufficient to comply with this aspect. The Court finds that the State must take, as soon as possible, all necessary measures to implement the training courses on human rights for the different State authorities indicated in paragraphs 251, 252 and 253 of the judgment. Consequently, the Court awaits that, in its next report, the State refer in detail to the measures it has adopted to offer the training courses, indicating the scheduling of the respective actions and the content of the training courses, who they will be offered to, and, if appropriate, the results. E) Obligation to publish, once, in the Official Gazette and in another national newspaper all the relevant parts of the judgment, and also to publish the entire judgment, for at least one year, on an appropriate official website of the State (thirteenth operative paragraph of the judgment) 28. In its brief of March 25, 2010, the State reported that, on February 5 and 14, 2010, it had published in the Diario de Centroamérica and El Periódico, respectively, the extracts of the judgment indicated by the Court in the thirteenth operative paragraph. The State acknowledged that “there had been an involuntary error in the omission of section C of Chapter XII, ‘Measures of satisfaction, rehabilitation, and guarantees of non-repetition,’ and also in the publication in El Periódico in which 9