49. The State indicated that it had deposited the amounts ordered in the Judgment in the Banco del Ahorro Nacional y Servicios Financieros, S.N.C. (BANSEFI), and had reported the payment before the Tenth District Civil Court in the Federal District. In this regard, it advised that, “on September 22, 2011, C. Justino García Téllez, widower of Andrea Radilla Martínez, and the executor of her will, went to the Court to collect two [cheques …] for the amounts allocated” in the Judgment in favor of the latter, equivalent to US$40,000.00 and US$325.00. Also, “in a decision of June 8, 2012, the judge [of the case …] decided the admissibility of handing over the deposit slips corresponding to Tita [Radilla Martínez], for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, and also costs and expenses, and to Rosendo Radilla Martínez, for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage.” In addition, “on July 19, 2012 [the said] judge […] decided that the deposit slips in favor of Rosendo Radilla Pacheco should be delivered to his heirs, through the person holding his power of attorney, Rosendo Radilla Martínez.” According to the State, the corresponding deposit slips have already been exchanged in BANSEFI. Consequently, it considered that this measure of reparation had been accomplished. 50. The victims and their representatives expressed their satisfaction for the fulfillment of the payment of the compensation ordered by the Court. For its part, the Commission “appreciate[d] the information presented by the State with regard to the payment of the amounts established in the Judgment.” 51. The Court understands that the information provided by the parties reveals that the State has complied fully with this measure of reparation. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, in exercise of its authority to monitor compliance with its decisions and pursuant to Articles 33, 621), 62(3) and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, 24 and 30 of the Statute, and 31(2) and 69 of its Rules of Procedure, DECIDES THAT: 1. As indicated in the pertinent considering paragraphs of this Order, the State has complied fully with its obligations: a) To implement, within a reasonable time and with the respective budgetary allocation, permanent programs or courses analyzing the case law of the inter-American system for the protection of human rights in relation to the limits of the military criminal jurisdiction, as well as a training program on the proper investigation and prosecution of acts that constitute forced disappearance of persons, pursuant to the twelfth operative paragraph of the Judgment. b) To produce a profile of the life of Rosendo Radilla Pacheco, pursuant to the fifteenth operative paragraph of the Judgment. c) To pay the amounts established in paragraphs 365, 370, 375 and 385 of the Judgment as compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and to reimburse costs and expenses, as applicable, pursuant to the seventeenth operative paragraph thereof. 18