2 a) set at a reasonable sum the professional fees regulated in case C-1099 of the Supreme Court of Argentina (operative paragraph two of the Judgment), and b) assume the payment of the fees and expenses of the attorneys engaged by the State and the Province of Santiago del Estero (operative paragraph three of the Judgment). 4. It will maintain open the procedure for monitoring compliance with all of the obligations pending compliance mentioned in the two previous declaratory paragraphs. And decide[d]: 1. To call upon the State to adopt all measures necessary to promptly and effectively comply with all pending aspects that were ordered by the Court in the Judgment on merits, reparations, and costs of November 28, 2002, in conformity with the provisions of Article 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights. 2. To request the State to submit to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, on October 15, 2009, a full and detailed report indicating all measures adopted to comply with the reparations ordered by this Court that are still pending compliance and, specifically, to refer to the information required by this Court […]. 3. To request the victim’s representative and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights to submit their observations on the State report mentioned in the previous operative paragraph, within four and six weeks, respectively, of receipt of the report. 4. To continue monitoring compliance with the paragraphs pending compliance of the Judgment on merits, reparations, and costs of November 28, 2002. […] 3. The brief of October 15, 2009, through which the Argentine Republic (hereinafter “the State” or “Argentina”) attached a copy of a document regarding the compliance of operative paragraph fourth of the Judgment. 4. The report of the Secretariat of the Court (hereinafter “the Secretariat”) of October 20, 2009, in which it indicated the State that in the brief presented on October 2009, it did not referred to that ordered by the Court in declarative paragraphs second and third of the Order of July 6, 2009. Because of this, following the instructions of the Presidency, the State was requested to present a complete, detailed State report in which it indicated all the measures adopted to comply with the reparations ordered by the Court on the Judgment that are still pending to be complied with, according to the stated in the Order of July 6, 2009. This requirement was reiterated on November 27, 2009; and February 25, May 14, and June 30, 2010. CONSIDERING: 1. That the monitoring of compliance of the decisions is an inherent faculty to the jurisdictional functions of the Court. 2. That Argentina is State Party to the American Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter “the American Convention” or “the Convention”) from September 5, 1984, and acknowledged the mandatory jurisdiction of the Court that same day.