c) To provide medical and psychological treatment, free of charge and through its specialized health institutions, to Victoria Margarita Palomino Buitrón, Esmila Liliana Conislla Cárdenas, María Dolores Gómez Palomino, Luzmila Sotelo Palomino, Emiliano Palomino Buitrón, Mónica Palomino Buitrón, Rosa Palomino Buitrón Margarita Palomino Buitrón, and the minor Ana María Gómez Guevara (tenth operative paragraph of the Judgment); d) To implement the education programs established in the Judgment (eleventh operative paragraph of the Judgment); e) To adopt the necessary measures to amend the criminal laws in order to make them compatible with international standards regarding forced disappearance of persons (twelfth operative paragraph of the Judgment), and f) To pay the balance of the amounts established in the Judgment (thirteenth, fourteenth and fifteenth operative paragraphs of the Judgment). 3. The brief of October 7, 2011, in which the State provided information on compliance with the Judgment (supra having seen paragraph 1). 4. The notes of the Secretariat of the Court (hereinafter “the Secretariat”) of October 12, 2011, in which, on the instruction of the acting President of the Court for this case (hereinafter “the acting President”), the State was requested to present, by October 28, 2011, at the latest, “a supplementary report in which it indicated, specifically and in detail, all the measures taken to comply with the reparations ordered by the Court in the seventh, eighth, tenth and eleventh operative paragraphs of the […] Judgment that remain pending” (supra having seen paragraph 1). 5. The brief of October 28, 2011, in which the State requested an extension of the time frame for forwarding the supplementary report requested in the notes of the Secretariat of October 12, 2011 (supra having seen paragraph 4), as well as the notes of the Secretariat of November 3, 2011, in which, on the instructions of the acting President and in keeping with the request submitted by the State, Peru was granted an extension until November 21, 2011. Lastly, the notes of the Secretariat of December 21, 2011, and February 15, 2012, in which, since the requested supplementary report had not been received, the State was again asked to forward this report as soon as possible. 6. The briefs of July 6 and 18, 2012, in which the State provided information on the discovery of the mortal remains of Santiago Fortunato Gómez Palomino, their return to his next of kin, and the payment of the expenses for an “adult burial/municipal charges.” It therefore asked the Court to find that the measure of reparation established in the eighth operative paragraph of the Judgment had been fulfilled. Regarding the other pending measures, it indicated that it was taking the pertinent measures to ensure full compliance with the Judgment. 7. The briefs of July 30 and August 1, 2012, in which the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Commission” or “the Commission”) and the representatives of the victims (hereinafter “the representatives”) presented their observations on the information forwarded by the State on July 6 and 18, 2012 (supra having seen paragraph 6). 8. The notes of the Secretariat of January 22, 2013, in which, on the instructions of the acting President, the State and the representatives were requested to advise, by January 29, 2013, at the latest, whether the amounts corresponding to the “contract covering all the costs of the construction of a permanent burial niche” and to the “funeral home” had been assumed by the State and, if applicable, to present the documentation to prove this. 2