required to provide the sum of US$6,121.09, due to expenses incurred for air fares, transportation, board and lodging during the public hearing. 166. This Court notes that the representatives have not duly authenticated all the expenses incurred prior to the public hearing in this case. The Court also notes that the victim and his representatives have provided vouchers for US$5,519.00. 144 Nevertheless, it is reasonable to presume that the victim and his representatives also incurred in expenditure following the lodging of the case before the Commission. Therefore, the Court finds it pertinent to order the reimbursement of reasonable litigation expenses, 145 which it establishes, in equity, at US$7,000.00 (seven thousand United States dollars) for costs and expenses. This sum shall be delivered to the victim’s representatives. The amount established for the representatives includes the expenses of the transportation, board and lodging for Mr. Urrutia Laubreaux owing to his participation in the public hearing. At the stage of monitoring compliance with this judgment, the Court may establish that the State reimburse the victim or his representatives any reasonable expenses incurred at that procedural stage.146 Method of compliance with the payments ordered 167. The State shall make the payments of the compensation for non-pecuniary damage and to reimburse costs and expenses established in this judgment directly to the persons indicated herein, within one year of notification of this judgment, without prejudice to making the complete payments in advance, pursuant to the following paragraphs. 168. If the beneficiaries are deceased or die before they receives the respective amounts, this shall be delivered directly to their heirs, pursuant to the applicable domestic law. 169. The State shall comply with the monetary obligations by payment in United States dollars or the equivalent in national currency using the exchange rate in force on the New York Stock Exchange (United States of America) the day before payment to make the respective calculation. 170. If, for reasons that can be attributed to the beneficiary of the compensation or his heirs, it is not possible to pay the amount determined within the indicated time frame, the State shall deposit the amount in his favor in a deposit account or certificate in a solvent Chilean financial institution, in United States dollars, and in the most favorable financial conditions permitted by banking law and practice. If the corresponding compensation is not claimed within ten years, the amount shall be returned to the State with the interest accrued. 171. The amounts allocated in this judgment as compensation for non-pecuniary damage, and to reimburse costs and expenses, shall be delivered to the persons indicated in full, as established in this judgment, without any deductions arising from possible taxes or charges. 172. If the State should fall into arrears, it shall pay interest on the amount owed corresponding to banking interest on arrears in the Republic of Chile. X OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS 144 Cf. Vouchers for costs and expenses provided by the representatives (evidence files, folios 3663 to 3742). Cf. Case of Órdenes Guerra et al. v. Chile. Merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of November 29, 2018. Series C No. 372., para. 140, and Case of Gómez Virula et al. v. Guatemala. Preliminary objection, merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of November 21, 2019. Series C No. 393, para. 115. 145 Cf. Case of Ibsen Cárdenas and Ibsen Peña v. Bolivia. Merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of September 1, 2010. Series C No. 217, para. 29, and Case of Azul Rojas Marín et al. v. Peru. Preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs, supra, para. 276. 146 40