11 included in the budget for the Fiscal Year 2008 and the total amount. The Commission, in addition, considered it was useful for the State to stay in contact with the representatives of the victims' next- of-kin in order to keep them informed on this issue and other aspects of compliance. 42. That the Court values the efforts made by the State to begin carrying out these measures of reparation. However, it notes that the compensations ordered have not been effectively paid and, specifically, that there is no clarity on whether the amounts proposed effectively correspond with the provisions set forth in the Judgment. Therefore, this Tribunal considers it is necessary that the State submits further information on this regard, especially on the way in which such payments would be implemented, in order to assess its full compliance. * * * 43. That this Court notes that the State has not furnished complete and detailed information regarding each one of the measures of reparations ordered in the Judgment. 44. That, likewise, the Court highlights the characteristic importance of the observations the Commission as well as the representatives of the beneficiaries will submit regarding the information furnished by the State. 45. That it is necessary to continue monitoring the compliance with the terms ordered in the Judgment, to which end the Tribunal could eventually summon the State, the representatives and the Commission to a hearing. THEREFORE, THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, by virtue of its authority to monitor compliance with its own decisions pursuant to Articles 33, 62(1), 62(3), 65, 67 and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, and Articles 25(1) and 30 of its Statute and 29(2) of its Rules of Procedure, DECLARES: 1. That it will keep open the procedure to monitor compliance with the following aspects pending compliance in the instant case, to wit: a) To carry out the necessary procedures to activate and conclude effectively, within a reasonable time, the investigation to determine the masterminds and perpetrators of the acts committed to the detriment of Agustín Goiburú Giménez, Carlos José Mancuello Bareiro, Rodolfo Ramírez Villalba and Benjamín Ramírez Villalba, and also complete the criminal proceedings that have been filed. In addition, these results must be published by the State within a reasonable time (operative paragraph five of the Judgment);