50 Jaramillo Correa, Gloria Elena Jaramillo Correa, Adriana María Jaramillo Correa, María Leticia Valle Jaramillo, Ligia Valle Jaramillo, Luzmila Valle Jaramillo, Magdalena Valle Jaramillo, Romelia Valle Jaramillo, Marina Valle Jaramillo, Darío Valle Jaramillo and Octavio Valle Jaramillo. 170. The Court points out that, in the instant case, despite the State’s acquiescence (supra paras. 35 and 38), it is not appropriate to declare Jesús María Valle Jaramillo a victim of the violation of Articles 8(1) and 25(1) of the American Convention, since in a case of extrajudicial execution the rights harmed are those of the deceased victim’s next of kin, who are the interested parties in the search for justice and to whom the State must provide effective remedies in order to guarantee them access to justice, the investigation and eventual punishment, if applicable, of those responsible for the violations, and the integral reparation of the consequences of the violations. IX ARTICLE 11(1) AND 11(2) (RIGHT TO PRIVACY)124 OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTION IN RELATION TO ARTICLE 1(1) (OBLIGATION TO RESPECT RIGHTS)125 THEREOF 171. The representatives alleged that the right to honor and dignity of Jesús María Valle Jaramillo and his next of kin, established in Article 11(1) and 11(2) of the Convention, had been violated because he had been “investigated by the Medellín Sectional Prosecutor’s Office for the offense of slander as a result of the complaint filed by a member of the Girardot Battalion, attached to the Fourth Brigade, on July 10, 1997.” The representatives also indicated that the right to family honor had been violated, since “the Valle Jaramillo family […] took upon itself […] the attack on Jesús María [Valle's] honor, of which he was made a victim when he was criminally charged, taking into account the family structure and Jesús María [Valle's] influence within it.” The representatives emphasized that “[h]onor must be safeguarded in its broadest sense, since an attack on one member of the family extends to all its members: family honor is part of personal honor and vice versa […]. Thus, any attack on the reputation of one person becomes an attack on the family.” In addition, the representatives based this alleged violation on the fact that the Governor of Antioquia at the time had labeled Jesús María Valle Jaramillo an “enemy of the Army […] in a context of conflict and [his] constant denunciations of the Army’s collaboration with paramilitary groups.” Lastly, the representatives alleged that Carlos Fernando Jaramillo Correa and his next of kin’s right to honor was violated “because […] they have been unable to return to the place where they have their properties and businesses and, in general, to the way of life built up with many years of work.” Hence, citing the Ituango Massacres case, as regards the connection between “deprivation and violation of the right to the use and enjoyment of property” and “violation of the right to honor and dignity of the population,” the 124 The pertinent part of Article 11 establishes that: 1. Everyone has the right to have his honor respected and his dignity recognized. 2. No one may be the object of arbitrary or abusive interference with his private life, his family, his home, or his correspondence, or of unlawful attacks on his honor or reputation. […] 125 Article 1(1) establishes that: The States Parties to this Convention undertake to respect the rights and freedoms recognized herein and to ensure to all persons subject to their jurisdiction the free and full exercise of those rights and freedoms, without any discrimination for reasons of race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, economic status, birth, or any other social condition.