71 8. In the instant case, it has not been proved that the State violated the right to privacy embodied in Article 11(1) and 11(2) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in the terms of paragraphs 176 to 180 of this judgment. 9. In the instant case, it has not been proved that the State violated the rights of the family embodied in Article 17 of the American Convention on Human Rights, in the terms of paragraph 184 of this judgment. 10. It is not appropriate to rule on the alleged violation of the rights to personal integrity, to freedom of thought and expression, and to freedom of association, embodied in Articles 5, 13, and 16, respectively, of the American Convention on Human Rights, to the detriment of the human rights defenders, since they are not alleged victims in the instant case, in the terms of paragraphs 188 to 191 of this judgment. 11. In the instant case, it has not been proved that the State violated the right to freedom of thought and expression embodied in Article 13 of the American Convention on Human Rights, in the terms of paragraphs 196 and 197 of this judgment. AND DECIDES, Unanimously, that: 12. This judgment constitutes per se a form of reparation. 13. The State must pay the amounts established in this judgment for pecuniary and nonpecuniary damage, and for reimbursement of costs and expenses, within one year of notification of this judgment, in the terms of paragraphs 207, 210, 216, 224 to 226 and 244 hereof. 14. The State must investigate the facts that gave rise to the violations in the instant case, in the terms of paragraphs 231, 232 and 233 of this judgment. 15. The State must publish once in the official gazette and once in another national newspaper with widespread circulation, paragraphs 2 to 4, 6, 29, 47, 70 to 78, 80 to 97, 104 to 107, 109, 110, 115, 122, 125 to 128, 130, 132, 140 to 144, 147, 160, 161, 165 to 170, 176 to 180, 184, 190, 191, 196, 197 and 200 of this judgment, without the corresponding footnotes but with the titles of the respective chapters, as well as its operative paragraphs, within one year of notification of this judgment, in the terms of paragraphs 227, 231 and 234 hereof. 16. The State must organize a public act to acknowledge its international responsibility for the violations declared in this case at the University of Antioquia within one year of notification of this judgment, in the terms of paragraph 227 and 231 hereof. 17. The State must place a plaque in memory of Jesús María Valle Jaramillo in the Courthouse of the Department of Antioquia within one year of notification of this judgment, in the terms of paragraphs 227 and 231 hereof. 18. The State must provide immediately and free of charge, through its specialized health care institutions, any psychological and psychiatric care required by the victims, in the terms of paragraphs 227, 231 and 238 of this judgment.